IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OPSAWG] example in tacacs yang was Re: Shepherd review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang

tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Thu, 18 June 2020 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0C83A09E5 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n13OwxgYiQYe for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr40107.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.4.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6A4A3A09B5 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=HTwXMgiEHaz0bPuWXpyrPjw6Pqlq0QAX45xx8EqU8+pTWjHH2WXQcl5WkMOA6pgKLc5vbsXS0UF7xmFzpHY+Som+kn8gKujO8B2rzn5udcLUsZo4/GgvukXXGL2KxxtxOeLWnRX9/EUVHZ7bHn0uzXK+B9ZAOZBVZCCr5b26kPe+hNkm/Ja3ARlGGm2TDZHMW8dXm2WrNXehmm07Pr6jHCjDgl1Wc4CJmPg6ga31wRrakzj70VfpMJeCdH7b6mLPHKzXxplREwNTReEOsOVV8TcAsRymBi9BtLSDGj8r3qELiPdMlmXj5y8vOGjzF/CfzHZk3oHyzzSZqLTbWAeo+w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KE76THCfhNAqgAfA0NHr+f+LNaVAuRScsaWin9O7Nbc=; b=EswxLwYiH6Rc4CyrQnXUKg9PfdG7nTT3jKu37BzFERCZUGCV1UZ76WP2PhuC+UlETNW6yQpaUAPwE6oH9Yu3iA9M4BiSQ54Ux3GlgtHci/ymR6dGSa5c2YjjQEcP5k9KZfhgShyrCaPWQs9MnIWl4Bvz3Ynu7rv7Xrmwcfpt2+E/+QHFC7IpUkdnip1Xkf30Lb4S1lDXoJLPCjkQQNJLgt62euYWf5oxV2zCE5KLkrGq4WFKcAw03ATt3xpu+e1bxcz4NdEwXvTmOKgRt4tvebF8T7G+ANHjjJD5MwN41zaqE8oIZiA7pBRsDlIEs+rMhnx4IwtJzuEVcMN+n72j7Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=KE76THCfhNAqgAfA0NHr+f+LNaVAuRScsaWin9O7Nbc=; b=tTU/7nstnSj4EyVdcGgb4tHcVjWFgOBhYmjkEnghXI0ocmvwk36YDOa5L4YilqBEn/ejo5ULNEYmxgTU8Vn7nWUqP1JHKyuAxox4EgJqgbOKP3Tw2qF+qo2ufsez350eCu56OkFYrzSeihW4AUx8uY07qwOhbsQj/UShmi6Qyco=
Received: from DBAPR07MB7016.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:198::14) by DB7PR07MB4604.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:5:36::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.12; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:01:14 +0000
Received: from DBAPR07MB7016.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::592c:285:6786:bc65]) by DBAPR07MB7016.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::592c:285:6786:bc65%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.018; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:01:14 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: example in tacacs yang was Re: Shepherd review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang
Thread-Index: AQHWNP+X27iPMWyAwkaTxJ9CxxxtKKjep9Iy
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:01:14 +0000
Message-ID: <DBAPR07MB7016F5548BFF458EA8422D23A09B0@DBAPR07MB7016.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <3C7473F5-75CE-4A80-BEF7-AD6431E031F1@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C7473F5-75CE-4A80-BEF7-AD6431E031F1@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [86.139.211.29]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1e0c389f-5216-43b7-c5a3-08d813a0d3bf
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR07MB4604:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB7PR07MB460477BB54E96A72608F3EFBA09B0@DB7PR07MB4604.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 0438F90F17
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: TFbl8AmA64d0SY8CXKdzGtJ3E+DLRXomLJi22AsvsxErhKT46RcTcm2HOx8Y30h9aqUCdBWafpAxHrIU04vUVbA39VAZZ83SiV4DMYDwTXF4MJvdVUuTCCL0g6gaMoVyNniQzsnqL0vTiKYULuhWwPXrczK+0j+azZP0tj7mRTsDjpG2mQZa8Q5OwY3v24dsdum+ZIjx7D5ueXC+dGBOZ0dHy1WM+RoO5PwIMIBi0s7u92hHeLWVxXfITMm1rQVq7wi0vL046AMSYxTnzjPptrKIi6d/G68I87/8ngjoVqdh/DeROzdltQPUgZVE4ypSk+l8lX2E81K8/KjQY5HX21PKN+Yd+myB2gCEX8xaxEqjpLyjCYP94OC0fGZoi0I2m+DaqVlcXNzlJ0TmEeYj2g==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DBAPR07MB7016.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(396003)(346002)(136003)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(53546011)(52536014)(6506007)(7696005)(2906002)(26005)(186003)(8936002)(8676002)(316002)(83380400001)(4744005)(966005)(478600001)(9686003)(55016002)(64756008)(66476007)(66946007)(76116006)(110136005)(91956017)(5660300002)(33656002)(71200400001)(66446008)(86362001)(66556008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: usqfDMOhh7crZhaz/wkiuMeGOUq/PPyGt7gZrtlz2g/jYAGcETtSHsYRPLEg+AgDxQ6VLoIT3zPsTrmC2IWEkW9E9AiWUPa87tEwDGxxrj3aFhO9xFjyp0/s9khS/1LKdCTk+7QIpsizCwKI250wyHWzeWbAwH2INx7wvJcnDrFNHNwRzGsb2Zd6Vj0Av9GaWAf5VJ11tq4haifED0mnmV8jjGL190LJuYtCnXTCEgc6b3ld4K6RLRMZ62MG+8TouDod1Sil7XMv2OXd//lmh3meuG7djWNJmjKcNJrv3LiTuj9gG/ya6yR9xatGivmR1TMS/6vtrVhnZy+t4uS7E21iW6udhak0Q9YAv4mSx2VBFGumCG5S3Dw08AuH9DWTgwahFexpyMoAqJJlXcdqP1k4k5INPCq3AGR9NPDh6p6fKVd7+/iz09oOo8UfZjf8tSGDEfWEl6houFS1kVXv4I5WFbCmxvnO7WMkwsQwFrU=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1e0c389f-5216-43b7-c5a3-08d813a0d3bf
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Jun 2020 16:01:14.0264 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 8dY4syhHCZNODf/CB/9ZkBhxSbdeaT/kOeecqizp6u7bfzL9PKm08ZPB/qPDDAMqzvwgj5KoNxiLoXVUSm/fEg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB4604
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/e4vK9NboblcSk1Gw43UXjO2E0Jg>
Subject: [OPSAWG] example in tacacs yang was Re: Shepherd review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:01:45 -0000

From: OPSAWG <opsawg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: 28 May 2020 15:52
To: opsawg


Looking at the example in tacacs-yang-06  I see it uses an address of 10.10.10.x. I think that this should be an address reserved for documentation 192.0.2 if I recall.

Tom Petch


I have completed my first draft of the shepherd write-up of this document.  In the abstract I noticed it says that this document defines “YANG modules” when it only defines “a YANG module” now.  Can text referring to the plural modules be updated?

Also, any other review of the write-up would be appreciated.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang/shepherdwriteup/

Joe
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email