IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 18 April 2017 07:51 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3C41317EC for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QKa1hcMdU2xB for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com (mail-vk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09F1B1317D6 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id r69so70978153vke.2 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mDwgh9I/9bu36KvVHZ4jH4OzP1kVjib45PQ1UVQtJfQ=; b=o0Pazzmr3JUJJAueR9nW7PbqfH1OK0ptbJzpzSq4qYy0lbs0OmhUjxnNfxzSFi9M43 akEg8D0gF2uD0Dwy6gUPJBAtH8lgXHtKHw5xQ3+MBnpJiqBuEClh45PkZkGT6TNlnlut uMFS/dBlSYJ5Tub14TQ+Ve7QUFu9B2PBOr3IJrPUOE/qMEslAEFZumqZ/EtNcYYwRUqv Vp7sfyqcfCLKxyL4q4CAMmjhARAtwd9SYE8YRiS/njg438bqfgs/RttV3u4f5vXs0PEl L/HnG0sAPvoFIY/ItsoyGyXD4xTQERPsp3Z/yMwrhabuYxWMmm0rgFdSByJkRDbnDP5X H6Cw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mDwgh9I/9bu36KvVHZ4jH4OzP1kVjib45PQ1UVQtJfQ=; b=iVHVDZs7r2SW6/SAAUDPIdA/yBWgHR9nXJPZehg3hvjVZf+8rmokW2RvJgexsZrYxR RY7yeMpP1Z+R8/TMqMlYluje7xmDt51ab3Uwqnds9AlYV/Ar9Y5hBOuu+rIjG2sgHGBr eiH2mqDnUFUZ4Sisazu+JXVf1ZNqMLpogB/fsvtw+3uU5r9bbcs6r8FVyTQSptSfdVhb J7CbWiYB6rg/rcG0RQ9mcSzqdn7p/2EMa7D8uH9NMXIEkTSGbSLpS8z60yoRX2n35BY+ MOUo8DWGvanqm/LGEcOW6xzZfTAq7bzArLdnIgm+L7T5vBju1iBkvOH6OAALNsOcHRuD tx0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7BkJQX2jrRbpzxLkLkdeme0aRKoJ2zx2dq+ptVChKiKPE6Aprc YcWtuXLMZqrSAkdA15AspJpsiksk+w1X
X-Received: by 10.31.146.12 with SMTP id u12mr4233404vkd.102.1492501899987; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.110.200 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3E179F05-ACCD-4290-A65F-57E4202FAA15@icloud.com>
References: <55cb757e-ee2d-4818-9fc2-67d559006f34@me.com> <3E179F05-ACCD-4290-A65F-57E4202FAA15@icloud.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:51:19 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr019Ga4jg6gVUHnTwh89hWArXKdAcAYEcW0m4gskrO7Ow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gunter Van De Velde <guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com>
Cc: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142f13093ca92054d6c2d3a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/6KmnKi5gftGp3yHw2wgCM-yAGWo>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:51:43 -0000

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Gunter Van De Velde <
guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com> wrote:

> Due to the IPv6 focus of "draft-ietf-opsec-v6" the OPSEC WGLC for this
> document may be of interest to both 6man as v6ops.
>
> Please send your feedback to OPSEC email list, where discussion around
> this document should take place.
>

I share Erik's concern around the ULA section. The has been controversial
for years. For example, see the thread starting at
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec/current/msg02012.html .

The vast majority of the text in 2.1.2 has not changed in any substantial
way since that heated debate, as shown by the diff:
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-opsec-
v6-08.txt&url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-11.txt .

Do we really have to have that debate again?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email