IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Mon, 17 April 2017 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C13129445 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 13:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v1daqWB2zkuA for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 13:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam03on0136.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.40.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55878129458 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 13:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=sbMq0BreFpnj6Vvw+uFIlUBNSAR53QQEvxhUz+I8b7U=; b=YsvZbbp0+gRliv1z31x+BxU+J4eQU188oBUIJAPAnze0WL7Y7OkwvI2sFpFqMxqbxSDNzG/9UDT4ro7/sxugq2I3v/hSGI5EJoz2jBCca6PnOoXkNFEKB/KJYK0xH3soFDI5+XG1E1aVudx5oIWs2Z49ZroktRdv4XJ1tP0/Rdo=
Received: from BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.164.23.21) by BLUPR0501MB2049.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.164.23.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1047.6; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 20:02:51 +0000
Received: from BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.23.21]) by BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.23.21]) with mapi id 15.01.1047.006; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 20:02:51 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Gunter Van De Velde <guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
Thread-Index: AQHSs1/wtwa3CP4FW0+mXO4vHe5YGKHKAuGQ
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 20:02:51 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR0501MB20512E6950AB4073EB4FC68CAE060@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <55cb757e-ee2d-4818-9fc2-67d559006f34@me.com>
In-Reply-To: <55cb757e-ee2d-4818-9fc2-67d559006f34@me.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: icloud.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;icloud.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.13]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR0501MB2049; 7:+wQa0rV/Of0a1n1uUfX89V3PlePMH0c46jJ1r4Q/8tL5W3n0T1NaclUz1jMulvx9zrfnc98p/PnwxMO7qavDlQTPT+UwXK+0h0LxhiJkHpXvss4tre2SjISODv+9GySi23PhWlxfk9Z389GHXz2VlW44huqE44hZUthrp0omHpGhjtYj75vtuYW26AqKwFeCjgXEdX1BtYGyK66wov3sO0xUmEbv+NKSWhfwl/L+/oyQTyMQkDQKUc6yDhW6l29RBJcuLauk8/K6BJ7LhAc/KmcaUfLUycZThYHQb8W2KOOHpQh+0AlVjKoF5D17Gdh6hCvCBMnfWcfz1ygdjbG0tQ==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4d68f3df-4ecd-488f-875c-08d485ccbaa6
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2049;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR0501MB20491243FE60CE81C380E096AE060@BLUPR0501MB2049.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(6072148); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2049; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2049;
x-forefront-prvs: 02801ACE41
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39400400002)(39850400002)(39410400002)(39860400002)(39450400003)(39840400002)(377454003)(77096006)(6306002)(9686003)(8936002)(5660300001)(54896002)(236005)(6246003)(74316002)(2900100001)(81166006)(99286003)(6436002)(8676002)(9326002)(3660700001)(790700001)(3280700002)(86362001)(19609705001)(606005)(3846002)(8666007)(6116002)(102836003)(53936002)(7736002)(7906003)(2950100002)(7696004)(76176999)(55016002)(2501003)(53546009)(66066001)(230783001)(25786009)(38730400002)(33656002)(6506006)(2906002)(50986999)(54356999)(101416001)(229853002)(189998001)(39060400002)(122556002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB2049; H:BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BLUPR0501MB20512E6950AB4073EB4FC68CAE060BLUPR0501MB2051_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Apr 2017 20:02:51.6599 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0501MB2049
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/xsek_N489_Yw2c2EjQ5DXU8doqg>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 20:02:57 -0000

Hi Gunter,


I support publication of this draft, but see a small problem in Section 2.2.2. In Section 2.2.2, the authors reference "ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling". This draft has been allowed to die on the vine, but artifacts can be seen in the following text from RFC2460bis.



" NOTE: While [RFC2460<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2460>] required that all nodes must examine and

   process the Hop-by-Hop Options header, it is now expected that nodes

   along a packet's delivery path only examine and process the Hop-by-

   Hop Options header if explicitly configured to do so."

You might want to update the draft with this change to 2460 in mind.

                                                            Ron


From: OPSEC [mailto:opsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gunter Van De Velde
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 3:39 AM
To: opsec@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6

This is to open a two week WGLC for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6.
If you have not read it, please do so now. You may send nits to the author, but substantive discussion should go to the list.


I will close the call on 26 April 2017


G/

Sent from iCloud

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email