IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Tue, 18 April 2017 07:07 UTC

Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BBE12778E for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uALlH46QOrX4 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F0A0127419 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13804; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1492499249; x=1493708849; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=8JvTsPVTcgHnFQ1ub+UzRkKT382Z4dO8Vgk9MfRfO90=; b=bJJV0K1QstKwJoCrlhpk62DNkj2X8tFOeguoMXWDtyYXUu/bAuez/zEN L4UE6f2ldI3WTNl7xGWvV0oIIro9NPDxuGIlIMz4rjBcRT7gPGoYeZMIK tmPEvgU3l6zBtUHrfMAX7QuGk+XnLUWHPayyXv8eNQwwu6ih71kaTY85p 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DTAgBMuvVY/4oNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm5lYYELB4NfihWRPiGQK4U0gg8shXgCGoNuPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUVAQEBAQMjZgIBCA4DAwEBASgDAgICMBQJCAIEARKJfwMVDqo7giYrhw0Qg1oBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYZSgV0rCoJjhHcWglAugjEFihOTCAGHA4tigX+FMINdhjqIaYsgAR84gQVjFUQRAYZTdYgOgQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,218,1488844800"; d="scan'208,217";a="413866534"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 18 Apr 2017 07:07:28 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3I77Rck008876 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:07:28 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 03:07:27 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 03:07:27 -0400
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, Gunter Van De Velde <guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
Thread-Index: AQHSs1/zAqT2GEaKCUyt76qDS1uIwKHKR32AgADbOAA=
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:07:27 +0000
Message-ID: <14BBD890-86C7-4366-AEB9-825DE9E44D68@cisco.com>
References: <55cb757e-ee2d-4818-9fc2-67d559006f34@me.com> <BLUPR0501MB20512E6950AB4073EB4FC68CAE060@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR0501MB20512E6950AB4073EB4FC68CAE060@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1e.0.170107
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.163.34]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_14BBD89086C74366AEB9825DE9E44D68ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/t_C3Y6m-oOqO4LJkJYLsLpcfCow>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:07:31 -0000

Thanks Ron for the review, your 2 points about the new RFC 2460bis are right to the point :-)

-éric

From: OPSEC <opsec-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Date: Monday 17 April 2017 at 22:02
To: Gunter Van De Velde <guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6

Hi Gunter,


I support publication of this draft, but see a small problem in Section 2.2.2. In Section 2.2.2, the authors reference “ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling”. This draft has been allowed to die on the vine, but artifacts can be seen in the following text from RFC2460bis.



“ NOTE: While [RFC2460<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2460>] required that all nodes must examine and

   process the Hop-by-Hop Options header, it is now expected that nodes

   along a packet's delivery path only examine and process the Hop-by-

   Hop Options header if explicitly configured to do so.”

You might want to update the draft with this change to 2460 in mind.

                                                            Ron


From: OPSEC [mailto:opsec-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gunter Van De Velde
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 3:39 AM
To: opsec@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6

This is to open a two week WGLC for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6.
If you have not read it, please do so now. You may send nits to the author, but substantive discussion should go to the list.



I will close the call on 26 April 2017



G/

Sent from iCloud

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email