Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing.

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Wed, 08 September 2010 05:51 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9011B3A63C9 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.289, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QVSN48Biog0i for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA4B3A6403 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joelja-mac.lan (c-98-234-104-156.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.104.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o885pkPC082209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 8 Sep 2010 05:51:47 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4C872472.6010704@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:51:46 -0700
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <987CBEA0-461E-47A3-907C-30DF30504E5A@kumari.net> <4C8654A4.5030609@gont.com.ar> <CB940D82-69CA-4F4E-9968-37ABE76CA537@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <CB940D82-69CA-4F4E-9968-37ABE76CA537@kumari.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:51:48 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: opsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing.
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:51:29 -0000

I will likely be in bejing.

I would sincerely hope that the docs I've been shepherding would be well
inside of the iesg by then.

joel
On 9/7/10 8:33 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> Could I get a virtual show of hands on the number of folk who are
> planning on attending Beijing?
> 
> It would be sad if we do decide to have an in person meeting and its
> just the chairs and Fernando who show up....
> 
> W
> On Sep 7, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
> 
>> Hi, Warren,
>>
>> I think that it would be valuable that the opsec wg meet at the next
>> IETF. FWIW, right now these documents could benefit from that meeting:
>>
>> * draft-ietf-opsec-icmp-filtering: We're right now working on a rev, and
>> this could be the last chance for the wg to discuss the document in
>> person. And might also be a good chance to engage people for reviews ;-)
>>
>> * draft-gont-opsec-ip-filtering: This I-D was produced upon suggestion
>> from Ron, and I'm right now re-structuring the document as suggested
>> (off-list) by Carlos Pignataro
>>
>> * draft-kristoff-opsec-port-filtering: This I-D was produced upon
>> suggestion from Ron. We have been making progress (slowly, though), but
>> we should have a more stable/complete version of the I-D ready by the
>> time opsec meets.
>>
>>
>> We might publish some other document in the mean time... but I think
>> that the above would already benefit from a face-to-face meeting.
>>
>> FWIW, I'm a co-author of the above three document, and I have been
>> attending only one every three IETF meetings, so I wouldn't want to miss
>> the chance to meet with the wg.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Fernando
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Warren Kumari wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> After some discussions Joe Abley and myself have decided that there
>>> is not sufficient work to merit in an in-person meeting of the WG at
>>> IETF79.
>>>
>>> If folk disagree and believe that we should meet / have important
>>> agenda items / things that they believe would be better expressed in
>>> person, please let us know...
>>>
>>> In addition, if folk are working on (or planning on working on)
>>> drafts that they believe should become WG items / be discussed on the
>>> list, please let us know...
>>>
>>> Warren (co-chair).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list
>>> OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Fernando Gont
>> e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
>> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSEC mailing list
>> OPSEC@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> 
> -- 
> "I try to be good hard-worker-man, but refrigemater so messy, so so messy."
>     -- NewsRadio.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>