Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing.
Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Wed, 08 September 2010 05:51 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9011B3A63C9 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.289, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QVSN48Biog0i for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA4B3A6403 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 22:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joelja-mac.lan (c-98-234-104-156.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.104.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o885pkPC082209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 8 Sep 2010 05:51:47 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4C872472.6010704@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:51:46 -0700
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <987CBEA0-461E-47A3-907C-30DF30504E5A@kumari.net> <4C8654A4.5030609@gont.com.ar> <CB940D82-69CA-4F4E-9968-37ABE76CA537@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <CB940D82-69CA-4F4E-9968-37ABE76CA537@kumari.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:51:48 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: opsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing.
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:51:29 -0000
I will likely be in bejing. I would sincerely hope that the docs I've been shepherding would be well inside of the iesg by then. joel On 9/7/10 8:33 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: > Could I get a virtual show of hands on the number of folk who are > planning on attending Beijing? > > It would be sad if we do decide to have an in person meeting and its > just the chairs and Fernando who show up.... > > W > On Sep 7, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Fernando Gont wrote: > >> Hi, Warren, >> >> I think that it would be valuable that the opsec wg meet at the next >> IETF. FWIW, right now these documents could benefit from that meeting: >> >> * draft-ietf-opsec-icmp-filtering: We're right now working on a rev, and >> this could be the last chance for the wg to discuss the document in >> person. And might also be a good chance to engage people for reviews ;-) >> >> * draft-gont-opsec-ip-filtering: This I-D was produced upon suggestion >> from Ron, and I'm right now re-structuring the document as suggested >> (off-list) by Carlos Pignataro >> >> * draft-kristoff-opsec-port-filtering: This I-D was produced upon >> suggestion from Ron. We have been making progress (slowly, though), but >> we should have a more stable/complete version of the I-D ready by the >> time opsec meets. >> >> >> We might publish some other document in the mean time... but I think >> that the above would already benefit from a face-to-face meeting. >> >> FWIW, I'm a co-author of the above three document, and I have been >> attending only one every three IETF meetings, so I wouldn't want to miss >> the chance to meet with the wg. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Kind regards, >> Fernando >> >> >> >> >> Warren Kumari wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> After some discussions Joe Abley and myself have decided that there >>> is not sufficient work to merit in an in-person meeting of the WG at >>> IETF79. >>> >>> If folk disagree and believe that we should meet / have important >>> agenda items / things that they believe would be better expressed in >>> person, please let us know... >>> >>> In addition, if folk are working on (or planning on working on) >>> drafts that they believe should become WG items / be discussed on the >>> list, please let us know... >>> >>> Warren (co-chair). >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list >>> OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec >>> >> >> -- >> Fernando Gont >> e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org >> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1 >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OPSEC mailing list >> OPSEC@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec > > -- > "I try to be good hard-worker-man, but refrigemater so messy, so so messy." > -- NewsRadio. > > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > OPSEC@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec >
- [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing. Warren Kumari
- Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing. Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing. Warren Kumari
- Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing. Richard Graveman
- Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing. Joel Jaeggli