IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing.

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Tue, 07 September 2010 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8AF3A6922 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.073
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.073 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.526, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H1qVjOS6MHaW for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f194.google.com (mail-gx0-f194.google.com [209.85.161.194]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8DB3A6809 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so1014064gxk.1 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cVtFmA5KQKYnWzt/gOUw8PyD52ROGUsruFkahbgQZhk=; b=qjexkI1rGnx/nfD5vvjscMlf+CiPVk+pER/K/GoqkIqiCS/F0sP460GBACze8j/gc5 Sh1BeMGOcNzyCujtb6hgNF7NCLWuuj6WxPqAiX2A/qGBeMKHUMcmkiEPs5kWIT00qVbu cFbIr6tKWjndzbZcgL0D/93gp49dYKl30Lat4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=vY+aogHX4pGGgic82AMK4EblJuq1kwP16ZmK+/zzv8IfTinWwWxQkJeTo28X1UCc1r R4tBeOLRJA4hEjsHMV/Zcm3YRQ7WwcPRkYZ80SP/TTuCnSQqV7ywhrO26GWBahYr3jvy lTrcdgieunrFKalK9B4/d1i9/CiATYTXoi2q4=
Received: by 10.150.147.9 with SMTP id u9mr409800ybd.48.1283871912385; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.141] ([190.139.184.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m12sm7463833ybn.19.2010.09.07.08.05.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Fernando Gont <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C8654A4.5030609@gont.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:05:08 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <987CBEA0-461E-47A3-907C-30DF30504E5A@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <987CBEA0-461E-47A3-907C-30DF30504E5A@kumari.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: opsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing.
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:04:50 -0000

Hi, Warren,

I think that it would be valuable that the opsec wg meet at the next
IETF. FWIW, right now these documents could benefit from that meeting:

* draft-ietf-opsec-icmp-filtering: We're right now working on a rev, and
 this could be the last chance for the wg to discuss the document in
person. And might also be a good chance to engage people for reviews ;-)

* draft-gont-opsec-ip-filtering: This I-D was produced upon suggestion
from Ron, and I'm right now re-structuring the document as suggested
(off-list) by Carlos Pignataro

* draft-kristoff-opsec-port-filtering: This I-D was produced upon
suggestion from Ron. We have been making progress (slowly, though), but
we should have a more stable/complete version of the I-D ready by the
time opsec meets.


We might publish some other document in the mean time... but I think
that the above would already benefit from a face-to-face meeting.

FWIW, I'm a co-author of the above three document, and I have been
attending only one every three IETF meetings, so I wouldn't want to miss
the chance to meet with the wg.

Thanks!

Kind regards,
Fernando




Warren Kumari wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> After some discussions Joe Abley and myself have decided that there
> is not sufficient work to merit in an in-person meeting of the WG at
> IETF79.
> 
> If folk disagree and believe that we should meet / have important
> agenda items / things that they believe would be better expressed in
> person, please let us know...
> 
> In addition, if folk are working on (or planning on working on)
> drafts that they believe should become WG items / be discussed on the
> list, please let us know...
> 
> Warren (co-chair).
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list 
> OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> 

-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email