Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing.

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 07 September 2010 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9863A68B5 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.416
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.416 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.183, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cX9HPmzubJfS for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.kumari.net (smtp.kumari.net [216.177.58.220]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C958C3A6A4D for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp.kumari.net (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 3F3062284A41; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:31:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dot.her.corp.google.com (unknown [74.202.225.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4ABD228468E; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:31:35 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <CB940D82-69CA-4F4E-9968-37ABE76CA537@kumari.net>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <4C8654A4.5030609@gont.com.ar>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:33:37 -0400
References: <987CBEA0-461E-47A3-907C-30DF30504E5A@kumari.net> <4C8654A4.5030609@gont.com.ar>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: opsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing.
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:33:21 -0000

Could I get a virtual show of hands on the number of folk who are  
planning on attending Beijing?

It would be sad if we do decide to have an in person meeting and its  
just the chairs and Fernando who show up....

W
On Sep 7, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:

> Hi, Warren,
>
> I think that it would be valuable that the opsec wg meet at the next
> IETF. FWIW, right now these documents could benefit from that meeting:
>
> * draft-ietf-opsec-icmp-filtering: We're right now working on a rev,  
> and
> this could be the last chance for the wg to discuss the document in
> person. And might also be a good chance to engage people for  
> reviews ;-)
>
> * draft-gont-opsec-ip-filtering: This I-D was produced upon suggestion
> from Ron, and I'm right now re-structuring the document as suggested
> (off-list) by Carlos Pignataro
>
> * draft-kristoff-opsec-port-filtering: This I-D was produced upon
> suggestion from Ron. We have been making progress (slowly, though),  
> but
> we should have a more stable/complete version of the I-D ready by the
> time opsec meets.
>
>
> We might publish some other document in the mean time... but I think
> that the above would already benefit from a face-to-face meeting.
>
> FWIW, I'm a co-author of the above three document, and I have been
> attending only one every three IETF meetings, so I wouldn't want to  
> miss
> the chance to meet with the wg.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> Fernando
>
>
>
>
> Warren Kumari wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> After some discussions Joe Abley and myself have decided that there
>> is not sufficient work to merit in an in-person meeting of the WG at
>> IETF79.
>>
>> If folk disagree and believe that we should meet / have important
>> agenda items / things that they believe would be better expressed in
>> person, please let us know...
>>
>> In addition, if folk are working on (or planning on working on)
>> drafts that they believe should become WG items / be discussed on the
>> list, please let us know...
>>
>> Warren (co-chair).
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list
>> OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>>
>
> -- 
> Fernando Gont
> e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

--
"I try to be good hard-worker-man, but refrigemater so messy, so so  
messy."
	-- NewsRadio.