Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing.

Richard Graveman <rfgraveman@gmail.com> Tue, 07 September 2010 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <rfgraveman@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6F03A6A49 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:41:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TJyZsv90oQZn for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D313A6A61 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so6228626iwn.31 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XOuJL+epYVIuF3DX2uGdpYSSLEpjSbS1CbhY9ux9W8Q=; b=YbT8zWPn2ZT41cCQSwOLi5jlLWOgwb8dXdawG721EdIMBpEWMlT4jdxn08Pl/KrDMU ++j+9f9X4RwaNqm4Ql7cvIdBD0NwqN0JOLXvJvUyZEhhv3pt8ph4mt1OPqoyuZthDAKx hIe3w5rCyfy7z08hw0DDd9fnastGQsnPnV7wE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=S3ZPIWzbqfS0x0HkkUgst8ZQXDMW9eiaedPfBk38FH4dmMcpdwCU0fflb6VI5Jk5rg KfzW7LAK0sb9W6bsJuMTWkFt2tr6LtHchL2g6fzWIFDW7+wojtejByURaBGqjhwuER0t T1P7euTp58Tmi1zpC2nua00dyt8zhuD6h1M3k=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.19.3 with SMTP id y3mr8072393iba.156.1283874115751; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.152.1 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 08:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CB940D82-69CA-4F4E-9968-37ABE76CA537@kumari.net>
References: <987CBEA0-461E-47A3-907C-30DF30504E5A@kumari.net> <4C8654A4.5030609@gont.com.ar> <CB940D82-69CA-4F4E-9968-37ABE76CA537@kumari.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:41:55 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTimxiZc6NtrrGPqtxOUzkogiYGuONdF+jPUsdeOR@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Graveman <rfgraveman@gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: opsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] No in-person meeting in Beijing.
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:41:33 -0000

I will attend, and I agree with Fernando.

Rich Graveman

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> Could I get a virtual show of hands on the number of folk who are planning
> on attending Beijing?
>
> It would be sad if we do decide to have an in person meeting and its just
> the chairs and Fernando who show up....
>
> W
> On Sep 7, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
>
>> Hi, Warren,
>>
>> I think that it would be valuable that the opsec wg meet at the next
>> IETF. FWIW, right now these documents could benefit from that meeting:
>>
>> * draft-ietf-opsec-icmp-filtering: We're right now working on a rev, and
>> this could be the last chance for the wg to discuss the document in
>> person. And might also be a good chance to engage people for reviews ;-)
>>
>> * draft-gont-opsec-ip-filtering: This I-D was produced upon suggestion
>> from Ron, and I'm right now re-structuring the document as suggested
>> (off-list) by Carlos Pignataro
>>
>> * draft-kristoff-opsec-port-filtering: This I-D was produced upon
>> suggestion from Ron. We have been making progress (slowly, though), but
>> we should have a more stable/complete version of the I-D ready by the
>> time opsec meets.
>>
>>
>> We might publish some other document in the mean time... but I think
>> that the above would already benefit from a face-to-face meeting.
>>
>> FWIW, I'm a co-author of the above three document, and I have been
>> attending only one every three IETF meetings, so I wouldn't want to miss
>> the chance to meet with the wg.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Fernando
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Warren Kumari wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> After some discussions Joe Abley and myself have decided that there
>>> is not sufficient work to merit in an in-person meeting of the WG at
>>> IETF79.
>>>
>>> If folk disagree and believe that we should meet / have important
>>> agenda items / things that they believe would be better expressed in
>>> person, please let us know...
>>>
>>> In addition, if folk are working on (or planning on working on)
>>> drafts that they believe should become WG items / be discussed on the
>>> list, please let us know...
>>>
>>> Warren (co-chair).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list
>>> OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Fernando Gont
>> e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
>> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSEC mailing list
>> OPSEC@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>
> --
> "I try to be good hard-worker-man, but refrigemater so messy, so so messy."
>        -- NewsRadio.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>