Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6

Folks,

I did a thorough review of at least half of the document a while a go. If
you need further reviews, I volunteer for that.

Since I haven't looked at the I-F for a while, it would count as a "fresh
review", I guess.

Thanks!
Cheers,
Fernando

El 6/5/2017 03:56, "Merike Kaeo" <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com> escribió:

> Just as Ack re capturing all the comments and discusisons and working with
> other co-authors to resolve.
>
> If anyone is at RIPE meeting and would like to discuss, let me know.
>
> - merike
>
> On May 4, 2017, at 11:39 PM, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <
> gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Authors from draft-ietf-opsec-v6 and OPSEC WG,
>
> There has been significant discussion during WGLC for this document and
> during the process indications that group consensus is on some topics is
> not reached yet.
> Last message from Merike indicates that draft authors will work on
> capturing all comments and resolve them with ‘group consensus’.
>
> I’ll be waiting for an updated document and check with authors and WG when
> time is ready for a fresh WGLC.
>
> G/
>
> *From: *OPSEC <opsec-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Gunter Van De Velde <
> guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 12 April 2017 at 09:39
> *To: *"opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[ALU] [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
>
> This is to open a two week WGLC for https://tools.ietf.org/
> html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6.
> If you have not read it, please do so now. You may send nits to the
> author, but substantive discussion should go to the list.
>
>
> I will close the call on 26 April 2017
>
>
> G/
>
> Sent from iCloud
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>
>