Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6

Tobias Fiebig <tobias@inet.tu-berlin.de> Sat, 06 May 2017 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias@inet.tu-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D851201F8; Sat, 6 May 2017 12:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4p-Z0aA9_ki; Sat, 6 May 2017 12:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de (mail.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.220.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D83127010; Sat, 6 May 2017 12:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smith.sec.t-labs.tu-berlin.de (unknown [IPv6:2600:8802:5708:1400:1a5e:fff:fe13:5966]) by mail.net.t-labs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E58E74; Sat, 6 May 2017 21:28:03 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1494098881.15550.37.camel@inet.tu-berlin.de>
From: Tobias Fiebig <tobias@inet.tu-berlin.de>
To: Merike Kaeo <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com>
Cc: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 12:28:01 -0700
In-Reply-To: <1C33CFA5-06F2-4706-873B-4F0E8A9108A5@doubleshotsecurity.com>
References: <55cb757e-ee2d-4818-9fc2-67d559006f34@me.com> <F6F72419-5A48-41FF-9308-A9980778E4CA@nokia.com> <1C33CFA5-06F2-4706-873B-4F0E8A9108A5@doubleshotsecurity.com>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-PysQ2FzWNE8kWu8ZzF0M"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.3 (3.22.3-1.fc25)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/N8Q1gfxIm3kQOZOfggKwvUajPjM>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 19:28:09 -0000

Heho,

On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 18:54 -0700, Merike Kaeo wrote:
> Just as Ack re capturing all the comments and discusisons and working
> with other co-authors to resolve.
> 
> If anyone is at RIPE meeting and would like to discuss, let me know.

As discussed at the last IETF I gave -11 of the document a review an
have some comments. Please find an inline-commented version attached.

With best Regards,
Tobias

-- 
Tobias Fiebig                      building MAR, 4th floor, room 4.003
Fachgebiet INET - Sekr. MAR 4-4        phone: +49 162 243 205 2
Technische Universität Berlin         gpg-fp: 21A9 91EB 4971 ED48 001E
Marchstrasse 23 - 10587 Berlin                FBBC B6AF 3CD8 59A2 795B