IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Mon, 09 February 2015 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443DD1A6F21; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 17:33:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oToa6NnJ7jiF; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 17:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F271A1B7F; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 17:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.196.201.172] (10-193.icannmeeting.org [199.91.193.10]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CF7D403BC; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 20:33:08 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <72C73500-E6C4-4D75-9CFA-8FE4B012AB9E@nominum.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:33:04 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7516AD5C-1152-4020-B050-FA0383B58DBA@viagenie.ca>
References: <20150207194616.20651.30892.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D5B607FA-9B47-4F1B-A0C1-FB0C94A97CDB@bogus.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1502071930100.25761@shell4.bayarea.net> <06B01D8E-981D-4D06-B6CC-3B5CE92782C5@nominum.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1502080813060.2950@shell4.bayarea.net> <D97E8BB3-0DB3-4B41-8C91-DBB3121DCEF7@nominum.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1502081507150.24776@shell4.bayarea.net> <72C73500-E6C4-4D75-9CFA-8FE4B012AB9E@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/kAW8PK2vTuF4Hav9ddUgkqEsvxk>
Cc: "draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield@ietf.org>, "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.ad@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.ad@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.shepherd@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "opsec-chairs@ietf.org" <opsec-chairs@ietf.org>, "brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 01:33:12 -0000

> Le 2015-02-09 à 09:30, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> a écrit :
> 
> On Feb 8, 2015, at 6:21 PM, C. M. Heard <heard@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Would your objections be addressed if Section 3 of the draft were 
>> replaced by something along the lines of the following?
> 
> No.   This is not a draft about filtering extension headers.  It is a draft about filtering DHCP.   The two are unrelated, and should not be discussed as if they were related.

I agree with Ted’s point above. The draft is about dhcpv6 not extension headers. 

Regards, Marc.

> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email