IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 08 February 2015 00:00 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39E91A1E0E; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 16:00:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pGzmt48_AFz; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 16:00:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EAB11A1ABB; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 16:00:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id lf10so17771009pab.12; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:00:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9n8DNyQ210YOtsrvuurXDvKK3PDvqzDYztBpR4vdjqM=; b=wYXDMsV5Uzci0h9hTQVZMAXf1Z8gHFhqUtJG4RTEGijQgGFcY3QIkQN454QO9BUP30 Fox6UyDAxig0aznxNbDcbytNPdCBKM738KAK6Jsvx3qlX021ch54vdswXK2H+77bwFJY CA8V1a0TFkzMnVZFSCfz/SimWH3Dpb6d2/ajcjPBINsT9jZCol1t9HzAJCx6LzbN1HrL 93bi7Kxz6KawaA25Fct3V3fanHa4yPr8rQj64Rni9YARVxbE4XwfNtTmKINLcMCLPzF1 UjNRzRvE9ZDxqyLQQ8ugTsTv93KxkRgPVCnekt9G8Y/Z5Ujg1OBH/zDOQKi0YGwX/t1Y /fRg==
X-Received: by 10.68.135.97 with SMTP id pr1mr17184501pbb.71.1423353632300; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:00:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:67be:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:67be:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x1sm12018287pda.90.2015.02.07.16.00.27 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:00:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54D6A719.1010401@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:00:25 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
References: <20150207194616.20651.30892.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D5B607FA-9B47-4F1B-A0C1-FB0C94A97CDB@bogus.com> <FBCB9A82-C8AF-4319-9795-6402921A791E@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <FBCB9A82-C8AF-4319-9795-6402921A791E@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/odPb0aQsbjjss0AjNgpuzI5hV3k>
Cc: "draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield@ietf.org>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.ad@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.ad@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield.shepherd@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "opsec-chairs@ietf.org" <opsec-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Ted Lemon's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsec-dhcpv6-shield-05: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 00:00:35 -0000

On 08/02/2015 09:37, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:
>> Right one would expect future extension headers to match the TLV  expectations of 6564. I can live with the removal of filtering advice but I'd like to see that run past the working group at the very least.
> 
> Sounds like a good plan.   Thanks!

However, I don't think you should remove this sentence and the normative reference
to RFC 7045:

   [RFC7045] requires that nodes be
   configurable with respect to whether packets with unrecognized
   headers are forwarded, and allows the default behavior to be
   that such packets be dropped.

  Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email