Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
Merike Kaeo <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com> Sun, 07 May 2017 10:38 UTC
Return-Path: <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DC7126C89; Sun, 7 May 2017 03:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4gYiGRCDuQdq; Sun, 7 May 2017 03:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B5C412422F; Sun, 7 May 2017 03:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.78.12] ([213.16.86.179]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id v47AcWqf013751 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 7 May 2017 03:38:34 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EB5469A4-9AC1-4FD6-A600-2C7A52E55B55"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Merike Kaeo <merike@doubleshotsecurity.com>
In-Reply-To: <1494098881.15550.37.camel@inet.tu-berlin.de>
Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 03:38:26 -0700
Cc: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsec-v6@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <78227789-D480-4C87-B99C-6D3A57C2B4AA@doubleshotsecurity.com>
References: <55cb757e-ee2d-4818-9fc2-67d559006f34@me.com> <F6F72419-5A48-41FF-9308-A9980778E4CA@nokia.com> <1C33CFA5-06F2-4706-873B-4F0E8A9108A5@doubleshotsecurity.com> <1494098881.15550.37.camel@inet.tu-berlin.de>
To: Tobias Fiebig <tobias@inet.tu-berlin.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVas0mzOHO5TzD2HwCWcKuZNlu/evINM4sw48Exenimmxhxi+i2mScCX9eYikkTekzOcyPYf7zWS5hZ0GG4Vt+wk
X-Sonic-ID: C;LnfNUBEz5xGyfyzL7bdh1w== M;FqXoUREz5xGyfyzL7bdh1w==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsec/x1tYYmwp0VDsZDQFYdIEQ8Cqx7I>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 May 2017 10:38:39 -0000
Thank you Tobias - indeed a thorough read and great comments that we as co-authors will be looking to get concensus on. - merike > On May 6, 2017, at 12:28 PM, Tobias Fiebig <tobias@inet.tu-berlin.de> wrote: > > Heho, > > On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 18:54 -0700, Merike Kaeo wrote: >> Just as Ack re capturing all the comments and discusisons and working >> with other co-authors to resolve. >> >> If anyone is at RIPE meeting and would like to discuss, let me know. > > As discussed at the last IETF I gave -11 of the document a review an > have some comments. Please find an inline-commented version attached. > > With best Regards, > Tobias > > -- > Tobias Fiebig building MAR, 4th floor, room 4.003 > Fachgebiet INET - Sekr. MAR 4-4 phone: +49 162 243 205 2 > Technische Universität Berlin gpg-fp: 21A9 91EB 4971 ED48 001E > Marchstrasse 23 - 10587 Berlin FBBC B6AF 3CD8 59A2 795B<draft-ietf-opsec-v6-11.txt>
- [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Gunter Van De Velde
- Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Ron Bonica
- Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Ron Bonica
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for draft-ietf-opse… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [OPSEC] FW: [ALU] Re: [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for d… Erik Kline
- [OPSEC] FW: [ALU] Re: [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for draft… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- [OPSEC] Fwd: Re: [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opse… Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 otroan
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for draft-ietf-opse… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 otroan
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 otroan
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 otroan
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] Re: [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for draft… Merike Kaeo
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] Re: [v6ops] Fwd: WGLC for draft… Merike Kaeo
- [OPSEC] ULAs [was WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] ULAs [was WGLC for draft-ietf… Ted Lemon
- Re: [OPSEC] ULAs [was WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v… james woodyatt
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] ULAs [was WGLC for draft-ietf… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 神明達哉
- Re: [OPSEC] [v6ops] ULAs [was WGLC for draft-ietf… Ted Lemon
- Re: [OPSEC] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Merike Kaeo
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Merike Kaeo
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Tobias Fiebig
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Merike Kaeo
- Re: [OPSEC] [ALU] WGLC for draft-ietf-opsec-v6 Merike Kaeo