Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] Design Team slides for IETF 63

Tony Przygienda <prz@net4u.ch> Sat, 30 July 2005 08:48 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dyn0v-0002yy-Rg; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:48:13 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dyn0u-0002yq-3H for ospf-wireless-design@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:48:12 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA28892 for <ospf-wireless-design@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:48:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from net4u.net4u.ch ([194.191.0.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DynWi-00024z-Oq for ospf-wireless-design@ietf.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 05:21:06 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by net4u.net4u.ch (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6U8ll1H020278; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:47:47 +0200
Received: from net4u.net4u.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (net4u [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20099-04; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:47:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.28] (zux221-095-208.adsl.green.ch [81.221.95.208]) (authenticated bits=0) by net4u.net4u.ch (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6U8lVQu020271 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:47:36 +0200
Message-ID: <42EB5AE0.8050900@net4u.ch>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:48:00 +0000
From: Tony Przygienda <prz@net4u.ch>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050328 Fedora/1.7.6-1.2.5
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
Subject: Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] Design Team slides for IETF 63
References: <77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6D512A8E@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6D512A8E@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at net4u.ch
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ospf-wireless-design@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: OSPF Wireless Design Team <ospf-wireless-design.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design>, <mailto:ospf-wireless-design-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/private/ospf-wireless-design>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-wireless-design-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design>, <mailto:ospf-wireless-design-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ospf-wireless-design-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: ospf-wireless-design-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Henderson, Thomas R wrote:

>All,
>The design team is not meeting in Paris, due to lack of a quorum.  Acee
>Lindem agreed to present the attached slides at the OSPF and MANET WG
>meetings.  Any comments?
>  
>
 From my meta-feeling and observation of proposals/discussion frequency, 
methodology
used, I think you are at the point where you should open your results to 
a wider forum.

>Currently, we have two fairly mature proposals for how to do OSPF MANET
>extensions, and one public implementation of each.  As for next steps,
>you will see a statement in the charts that we have not yet achieved
>consensus.  Acee indicated his preference to let the design team run for
>one more cycle, possibly augmented by discussion on the regular MANET
>and OSPF WG lists.  Are there comments on this proposed approach?
>  
>
Again, I think you should release the software to a wider audience and 
let people run their
scenarios and provide you with results. This should give you  a good 
indication what the
consensus on the two proposals or a variation thereof should be beside 
purely technical
points that you seem have shaken out roughly and do seem to have a 
struggle merging
(again, from my understanding so far the two have different strengths 
depending
on the scenario assumed).  Then, IMHO you will be able to progress to 
spec-stage work.

    --- tony



_______________________________________________
Ospf-wireless-design mailing list
Ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design