IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP Hybrid Interface

"Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com> Thu, 12 May 2011 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A421DE07D1 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0MLN3AoWJrs9 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stl-smtpout-01.boeing.com (stl-smtpout-01.boeing.com [130.76.96.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC30E07BE for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (stl-av-01.boeing.com [192.76.190.6]) by stl-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/8.14.4/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id p4CK6b0f013422 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 May 2011 15:06:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id p4CK6baR023616; Thu, 12 May 2011 15:06:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from XCH-NWHT-06.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-06.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.25.110]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id p4CK6bF2023597 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Thu, 12 May 2011 15:06:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.85]) by XCH-NWHT-06.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.110]) with mapi; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:06:36 -0700
From: "Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
To: 'Acee Lindem' <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:06:36 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP Hybrid Interface
Thread-Index: AcwQKesEH1ZtPkRLTmCv11x5NDBn1wAtTrtw
Message-ID: <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CEED717C8@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <B072BEDD-793D-4BC5-8227-BBB37F1D56D2@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <B072BEDD-793D-4BC5-8227-BBB37F1D56D2@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP Hybrid Interface
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:06:41 -0000

> Hence, the questions for the WG are:
> 
> 
>   1. Do we want to accept draft-nsheth-ospf-hybrid-bcast-and-p2mp-
> 01.txt as a WG document?
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nsheth-ospf-hybrid-bcast-and-
> p2mp

I have no objection.

> 
>   2. Do we wish to allow revisions of the OSPF MANET experimental RFCs
> to cover the single-hop case (and possibly minor corrections)?
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5449/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5614/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5820/
> 

I would be interested to work on this.

- Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email