IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP Hybrid Interface

Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com> Thu, 12 May 2011 20:20 UTC

Return-Path: <sratliff@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F6FE073C for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8c2Rti3igb2p for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEA8E072E for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=sratliff@cisco.com; l=4385; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1305231622; x=1306441222; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:mime-version:subject: date:references; bh=+CmfadeHSJAg5hEGzPMqxVGUTrnKpXm11aIiZeOpo5c=; b=jo+9BktMF9lVf4Bt02PhqjN/RlC7rQBEZbSJdqUnzp23vW3U5MOZxlqs h8xyFTMyfi5spBMEeFsooH8J2/7/wr3uSSGfyBsKpyqITK9R3LTtyZKpb QJK7mcH9N9wF55TSuEbIPF2pv6Z1Gb9f+cap5dea5LtIT9zUm3mwzQT16 c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAN4/zE2tJV2Y/2dsb2JhbACleXeIcKFpniyGFQSPe48F
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.64,360,1301875200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="314440889"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2011 20:20:21 +0000
Received: from dhcp-64-102-54-197.cisco.com (dhcp-64-102-54-197.cisco.com [64.102.54.197]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p4CKKLjD001709; Thu, 12 May 2011 20:20:21 GMT
Message-Id: <E4FDD8DA-B1EF-4BE8-B73C-D189BC51D9BB@cisco.com>
From: Stan Ratliff <sratliff@cisco.com>
To: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimEkkPbZTU+YigYhPhZ51OX_OhENw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-31-506906799"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 16:20:21 -0400
References: <B072BEDD-793D-4BC5-8227-BBB37F1D56D2@ericsson.com> <2074293751.2136952.1305230813391.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr> <BANLkTimEkkPbZTU+YigYhPhZ51OX_OhENw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP Hybrid Interface
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:20:22 -0000

Yes on both questions.

Regards,
Stan

On May 12, 2011, at 4:14 PM, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Henderson, Thomas R <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com 
> > wrote:
> > Hence, the questions for the WG are:
> >
> >
> >   1. Do we want to accept draft-nsheth-ospf-hybrid-bcast-and-p2mp-
> > 01.txt as a WG document?
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nsheth-ospf-hybrid-bcast-and-
> > p2mp
>
> I have no objection.
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> >
> >   2. Do we wish to allow revisions of the OSPF MANET experimental  
> RFCs
> > to cover the single-hop case (and possibly minor corrections)?
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5449/
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5614/
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5820/
> >
>
> I would be interested to work on this.
>
>
> Count me in too!
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
>
> - Tom
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email