Re: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP Hybrid Interface
Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr> Thu, 12 May 2011 20:15 UTC
Return-Path: <emmanuel.baccelli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C829DE072E for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1zcdlVYEVXDh for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053C1E06A1 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so1557132fxm.31 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=p1HSzyMWE87NyO2KyzngHkWlRT6CE1zj/r0DXLOMigE=; b=Os5XmzatGxptYjPxKrTLWlxGoVzqk7pyikZ6CbkkFqlyIz1EmGYClkAPxonftDMXua InjXU2hNTPhZEGi5OXT4yVdsN4l9PsqgUkPUcuxCAJImMwTADgrgWGMp7pL+ywpA4Kb8 yJdCTHk6QC6SZgq3a0AAAjvyDoU1PNLroZcqs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=L4bs0t04ylDMdRYN42VRSbOnxqWj13BFTO7xbe6QbMMBp1Hz5oSAI9VHF5WQChcHUv jcemqmMJmVNKnqPp+FZcqrKkuzOEcnZP7aRGMkGMev3I1j8Vr7kTCdk4QwXGYzK+tuQt e2IPdsPWn0KxK6XLefSIpCfCoIkO7YSq9s07E=
Received: by 10.223.127.210 with SMTP id h18mr759381fas.67.1305231308125; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: emmanuel.baccelli@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.109.11 with HTTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 13:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2074293751.2136952.1305230813391.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr>
References: <B072BEDD-793D-4BC5-8227-BBB37F1D56D2@ericsson.com> <2074293751.2136952.1305230813391.JavaMail.root@zmbs1.inria.fr>
From: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 22:14:48 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: eOHx8oIe0VpRX_lmAKKjAX2oJk8
Message-ID: <BANLkTimEkkPbZTU+YigYhPhZ51OX_OhENw@mail.gmail.com>
To: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0023545309707875ef04a319d816"
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP Hybrid Interface
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:15:09 -0000
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Henderson, Thomas R < thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com> wrote: > > Hence, the questions for the WG are: > > > > > > 1. Do we want to accept draft-nsheth-ospf-hybrid-bcast-and-p2mp- > > 01.txt as a WG document? > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nsheth-ospf-hybrid-bcast-and- > > p2mp > > I have no objection. > +1 > > > > > 2. Do we wish to allow revisions of the OSPF MANET experimental RFCs > > to cover the single-hop case (and possibly minor corrections)? > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5449/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5614/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5820/ > > > > I would be interested to work on this. > Count me in too! Emmanuel > > - Tom > _______________________________________________ > OSPF mailing list > OSPF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf >
- [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP Hyb… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP… John E Drake
- Re: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP… Richard Ogier
- Re: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP… Retana, Alvaro
- Re: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP… Alia Atlas
- Re: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP… Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP… Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [OSPF] Single Hop MANET versus Broadcast/P2MP… Stan Ratliff