Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental

Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem <veerendranatharv@huawei.com> Mon, 12 January 2015 05:32 UTC

Return-Path: <veerendranatharv@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECEC1A8A4B for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:32:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.422
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.422 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y3XEwt5ezg-7 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:32:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 273231A8895 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 21:32:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRC80172; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:32:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.152) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:32:12 +0000
Received: from szxeml561-mbx.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.217]) by szxeml413-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.152]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:32:04 +0800
From: Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem <veerendranatharv@huawei.com>
To: "Wunan (Eric)" <eric.wu@huawei.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental
Thread-Index: AQHQLRmyvootEbC0aUKyIBteteuJP5y7NigAgADBYsA=
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:32:04 +0000
Message-ID: <73BFDDFFF499304EB26FE5FDEF20F7884595F5D5@szxeml561-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <D0D6FF2C.B5B6%acee@cisco.com> <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A6503ACDEFC8@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A6503ACDEFC8@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.150.250]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/4dZKLoB4KpPBZNrr2nFu7SvDEXk>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:32:20 -0000

Support.

Regards,
Veerendranath

-----Original Message-----
From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wunan (Eric)
Sent: 12 January 2015 09:58
To: Acee Lindem (acee); OSPF WG List
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental

Support!

Regards
Eric

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com] 
发送时间: 2015年1月11日 5:09
收件人: OSPF WG List
主题: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental


We have discussed OSPF TTZ at several IETFs and the authors and their colleagues have even developed a working prototype. We believe there is consensus that the protocol mechanisms are viable. However, there is disagreement as to whether or not these mechanisms will provide significant benefit. The answer is definitely topology and deployment dependent. After some discussion, we have decided to poll for adoption as an experimental draft. Please indicate your support or opposition WG adoption as experimental prior to January 24th, 2015.

For your convenience, here is a URL for the draft:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt

Thanks,
Acee and Abhay 


_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf