Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental

<ningso@yahoo.com> Mon, 12 January 2015 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ningso@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFCA1A8A07 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:00:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.691
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.691 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8FzKtxYiPz6 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:59:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nm47-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm47-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.115.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3824A1A89F9 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 17:59:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1421027998; bh=Z45ApK6LqR3rtuoEBIWuBGfoe3reQZoKQBIM8uBq0AU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=sJL/YCgZH0dR3t9qomNsH0lJAcZTnKg63/Oi5+JazJSajbQL2gYoGs7fvRCX4ZT51ZVOgVe/WlpHWI4BtUYS9MXNfTALc8oQWeaAXakpXUkSa5l9l8DvUKujRwzT1sEPCSQUgwk5Y39fs1mZsmJ+n4TvQ7bFDOnV8V9ZUKKiUaPCI/kNwWMdVuapbo7TPq1kJ9463QJbhXTsD+9r57Y8Z1C1IwBMXaFwsuqNMGrq002n8qHhn5XqTDgYsgVoACaQZZgRd53PVyoRIIJzHCv4tZ88GdH1DWwNBR+ykZIOJVsu0JkEM+eAuCQVA31uq6b0SD2hKxkKTOzA7Co66M6JgA==
Received: from [66.196.81.174] by nm47.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jan 2015 01:59:58 -0000
Received: from [98.139.212.199] by tm20.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jan 2015 01:59:58 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1008.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jan 2015 01:59:58 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 314254.79271.bm@omp1008.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: tR1k7ngVM1n9L8q412Kmf_9ANb69b6Tpgjd6iD.8WFPudMCVgggmzDo5pROZnF4 CLIxi1JqOX_2NDJtx0a4g2gtLQL4LmzKZN0iCDVT7uLTKaFCRDyQj4nHMN5_kZxrKc3gTTxHOTHf LPVr4PhseI61xkO_FzDw5c66lqhxpLxaK3yq2grKCZ5C6tU4CRhX_5jiHq7J7Z_.79QVbg7pRgWd v_OaPsUEl_FNvykNPERzMSyQX3o_zH723q3J3SXVM0o0fxIYWNpSyqmfOPXgCeRUO1g9Ydo5Cbof hiZdARunK93VZKT53R5FoN2VOBQeQ.Z3vykbN5xJmhPjM3RQUK4i7oS0zwQAgaIW.Q52Dg78lcSo vk4SzYiVPVoOuAf.4NNueDrcgdFpd4WQxosZxfPyAh_eEyIUV7.uI_KYsoJD5HxgdHQ.LFsl6gO3 _oqqrJQL1fDoRlC1ZXGKtiVXIjGaDMrp6kFhgYJRzR_VVED01drvsFBDTx_RqSJkYM4bwgQm0zAY u47_MaUvkfaIGTOVR2wBjXCDBuu4in9B3CvfuvGRae_jx6eSJh5OKDr5ABilfVGhEd8RIyqSH1_o DrCDFNZ0-
Received: by 76.13.26.138; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 01:59:57 +0000
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 01:59:57 +0000
From: ningso@yahoo.com
To: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1477146822.683105.1421027997570.JavaMail.yahoo@jws10657.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_683104_665521028.1421027997567"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/QOuwOKpllJUDaf65RGJzgWTuTwY>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ningso@yahoo.com
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 02:00:01 -0000

Support as co-author. Ning So972-955-0914
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> We have discussed OSPF TTZ at several IETFs and the authors and their
> colleagues have even developed a working prototype. We believe there is
> consensus that the protocol mechanisms are viable. However, there is
> disagreement as to whether or not these mechanisms will provide
> significant benefit. The answer is definitely topology and deployment
> dependent. After some discussion, we have decided to poll for adoption as
> an experimental draft. Please indicate your support or opposition WG
> adoption as experimental prior to January 24th, 2015.
>
> For your convenience, here is a URL for the draft:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt
>
> Thanks,
> Acee and Abhay
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf