IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental

LEI LIU <liulei.kddi@gmail.com> Tue, 13 January 2015 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <liulei.kddi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C421B29EC for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:03:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I__BHdGaRSC3 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:03:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com (mail-ig0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5941B29E5 for <OSPF@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:03:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id z20so5713760igj.4 for <OSPF@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:03:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=T8Qme4AXranU/XMYbKmmiSbFmIikHcBW+gKdcpHtbyg=; b=o0Dpo0m7Xul94nuC9LsPWp+M974mk1Ln/5ayP6uElvM6P5Ktog7wpSHV7JrjHD0IkR V1NmnqAPv6t6ykJMbhmJ3pnPiwhkD47LMo1ZtcXaxhqWvRpxG9MV0CJVC4eSQ1iq/jAj LiZg8faWrqEnaGd5gBol3LLBLwmdsmW631k9/yjWs4TzFmYlxoXsovIkW6RqIO2uJLPp G4+szQ2/6pxOTnl6hy6n6WJ+YX0Ude7+ogfiVdO3AbdzwBT4K8DVDG1mnYZY3+dpvhS5 r61RYwbUtos/gdS0aWhW1WhXsZhlCRcmo0stL271guJHGmT5lUcpUvMBRgnsU617cF+n GHwg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.29.6 with SMTP id p6mr1498114icc.85.1421186601128; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:03:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.155.170 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:03:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <724FE0750664CC4BA0882B29E7455799011E492F@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
References: <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D445CDD4ED@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com> <724FE0750664CC4BA0882B29E7455799011E492F@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:03:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CAEy9f1kGY6ieRX9pNC8spmBUCUThjuYimV7t04wRcdrjsm40hA@mail.gmail.com>
From: LEI LIU <liulei.kddi@gmail.com>
To: "OSPF@ietf.org" <OSPF@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf301d42668518a1050c8fca57"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/sypfPSYFRl3cCQmpMFG7rKQwi30>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 22:03:27 -0000

Support it (as a co-author).

Thanks,
Lei

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Kiran.Makhijani <Kiran.Makhijani@huawei.com
> wrote:

> Support.
>
> Thanks
> Kiran
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
> Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 4:09 PM
> To: OSPF WG List
> Subject: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption
> as Experimental
>
>
> We have discussed OSPF TTZ at several IETFs and the authors and their
> colleagues have even developed a working prototype. We believe there is
> consensus that the protocol mechanisms are viable. However, there is
> disagreement as to whether or not these mechanisms will provide significant
> benefit. The answer is definitely topology and deployment dependent. After
> some discussion, we have decided to poll for adoption as an experimental
> draft. Please indicate your support or opposition WG adoption as
> experimental prior to January 24th, 2015.
>
> For your convenience, here is a URL for the draft:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt
>
> Thanks,
> Acee and Abhay
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email