IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03

Pushpasis Sarkar <psarkar@juniper.net> Mon, 03 November 2014 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <psarkar@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789871A0AFE for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:19:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sutvl9lWXM3B for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:19:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0121.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF43A1A040B for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:19:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.65.151) by BN1PR05MB517.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.65.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:19:00 +0000
Received: from BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.14.76]) by BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.14.76]) with mapi id 15.01.0011.000; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:19:00 +0000
From: Pushpasis Sarkar <psarkar@juniper.net>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03
Thread-Index: AQHP93l+WJW7C4f3qke0kZrPFw66Dg==
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:19:00 +0000
Message-ID: <D07D9AC4.167DA%psarkar@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.5.141003
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.17]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR05MB517;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-forefront-prvs: 0384275935
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(199003)(479174003)(189002)(24454002)(51704005)(36756003)(101416001)(54356999)(50986999)(86362001)(92566001)(92726001)(40100003)(122556002)(97736003)(77156002)(77096003)(62966003)(19580395003)(15975445006)(19580405001)(83506001)(2656002)(95666004)(99286002)(31966008)(106356001)(105586002)(20776003)(106116001)(64706001)(46102003)(4396001)(21056001)(230783001)(87936001)(99396003)(120916001)(107046002)(107886001)(66066001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR05MB517; H:BN1PR05MB520.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <55FCA1121EADD046A28939CB382A5262@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/4k534T2nQr2lmg2QTYPXFatCVN4
Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:19:04 -0000

Support.

On 11/3/14, 7:50 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

>The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this
>document now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon
>for OSPFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document is
>ready for a WG adoption poll.
>
>Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
>Document.
>
>Regards,
>-Abhay
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email