[OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 03 November 2014 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F0B1A0367 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 06:20:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id INN6yy_UH6he for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 06:20:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EA5D1A033B for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 06:20:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=355; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415024429; x=1416234029; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=g58kSermFleSE6UU/2TfznM4ptfAPxdJeW8Dks25jMk=; b=UXAkK9SRtwBhcEe5tgaSbtf5oADrzcBwD10VtO0Wxh0yzUYyjJTAgeQ+ KK4S85lLLZjoi8cc62WHJUzQqr0yy7qN1oZeQem+oWJLxY+VmSd8Jwcl7 tMDDu+6ZacKYD45fSZ+26yHnBbcAvIIjJKisIfE57D1GiLYT+krDcL7ql 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgcFAK6OV1StJV2P/2dsb2JhbABcgw6BMNZ1FgEBAQEBfYQJOlEBPgU9JwSIVKNyo24BAQgCAR+VYgWSGotngTGDTY1JhAmCNIFEgjSBAwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,308,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="92843118"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2014 14:20:29 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com [173.37.183.81]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA3EKRlo027048 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 14:20:27 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.61]) by xhc-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([173.37.183.81]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:20:27 -0600
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03
Thread-Index: AQHP93FQCqOuGAAuIkuxwA9maUkTeA==
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:20:26 +0000
Message-ID: <D07CF958.7433%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.204]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <7AEC35AFDECA2348982E15155FB6AAE3@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/ltuhzUTxGzcBpv8MpVCGct1851I
Subject: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 14:20:29 -0000

The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this
document now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon
for OSPFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document is
ready for a WG adoption poll.

Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
Document.

Regards,
-Abhay