Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03

Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net> Mon, 03 November 2014 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8921A0398 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:33:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PFiz1agHDF87 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0147.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E90531A03A9 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLUPR05MB436.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.27.152) by BLUPR05MB707.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.207.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:33:14 +0000
Received: from hannes-mba.local (193.110.55.11) by BLUPR05MB436.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.27.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.11.14; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:33:12 +0000
Received: from hannes-mba.local (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by hannes-mba.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72058561F2C; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:33:03 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:33:03 +0100
From: Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20141103153303.GB27173@hannes-mba.local>
References: <D07CF958.7433%acee@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D07CF958.7433%acee@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Originating-IP: [193.110.55.11]
X-ClientProxiedBy: AM3PR06CA021.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.192.139) To BLUPR05MB436.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.27.152)
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;UriScan:;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB436;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0384275935
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(24454002)(189002)(199003)(23726002)(92566001)(66066001)(64706001)(92726001)(120916001)(105586002)(47776003)(20776003)(76506005)(40100003)(62966003)(77096003)(77156002)(97736003)(46406003)(122856001)(98436002)(106356001)(107046002)(122386002)(50986999)(97756001)(54356999)(87976001)(33656002)(102836001)(86362001)(101416001)(46102003)(76176999)(4396001)(99396003)(110136001)(95666004)(83506001)(50466002)(230783001)(15975445006)(21056001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(31966008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB436; H:hannes-mba.local; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB707;
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/Xv_nffPNt7semLXLhlmQ3oAObmU
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF Extensions to Support Maximally Redundant Trees" - draft-atlas-ospf-mrt-03
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:33:18 -0000

support;

On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 02:20:26PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
| The base MRT specifications are rtgwg WG documents. Additionally, this
| document now uses the OSPFv2 link extensions that we have converged upon
| for OSPFv2 protocol extension. Hence, the chairs believe this document is
| ready for a WG adoption poll.
| 
| Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
| Document.
| 
| Regards,
| -Abhay
| 
| _______________________________________________
| OSPF mailing list
| OSPF@ietf.org
| https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf