Re: [OSPF] update "draft-kou-ospf-immediately-replying-hello-00.txt"

Hi Zengjie,
Russ White wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>  
>
>>Speaking as a WG member, my personal opinion is that the WG should
>>accept this document an an informational of BCP track RFC.
>>    
>>
>
>This sounds fine.... Count my vote in that direction, as well.
>  
>
Actually, I meant NOT accept as WG document I guess that what I get for
trying
to respond to E-mail sitting in the middle seat on a crowded plane. Here
is my
reasoning why:

1. This behavior is not new - there are several implementations that
already reply immediately in certain situations.
2. There are many ways of doing this and it is unlikely we will
agree on the exact details of how it should be done. I, for one,
have implemented it differently than documented in this draft.

I just don't think there is that much to be gained by documenting
this after the fact when there isn't agreement on the sudtleties of
operation.

Sorry for the confusion.

Thanks,
Acee

>:-)
>
>Russ
>
>
>
>- --
>riw@cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
>iD8DBQFEk/wDER27sUhU9OQRAvY9AKCrebSk6VRgr6L/SJGB12m4ZErV0ACg1B+8
>UKcbdXfJwL/u5nzZERpS7HI=
>=8pvC
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf