Re: [OSPF] update "draft-kou-ospf-immediately-replying-hello-00.txt"

At 20:09 17/06/2006, Acee Lindem wrote:
>Hi Zengjie,
>Russ White wrote:
>
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>Speaking as a WG member, my personal opinion is that the WG should
> >>accept this document an an informational of BCP track RFC.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >This sounds fine.... Count my vote in that direction, as well.
> >
> >
>Actually, I meant NOT accept as WG document I guess that what I get for
>trying
>to respond to E-mail sitting in the middle seat on a crowded plane. Here
>is my
>reasoning why:
>
>1. This behavior is not new - there are several implementations that
>already reply immediately in certain situations.
>2. There are many ways of doing this and it is unlikely we will
>agree on the exact details of how it should be done. I, for one,
>have implemented it differently than documented in this draft.

and more particularly it doesn't matter from an interoperability 
point of view which way you do it, so
this doesn't seem to be behaviour which it makes sense to standardize.

         Mike

>I just don't think there is that much to be gained by documenting
>this after the fact when there isn't agreement on the sudtleties of
>operation.
>
>Sorry for the confusion.
>
>Thanks,
>Acee
>
> >:-)
> >
> >Russ
> >
> >
> >
> >- --
> >riw@cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone
> >
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
> >Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >
> >iD8DBQFEk/wDER27sUhU9OQRAvY9AKCrebSk6VRgr6L/SJGB12m4ZErV0ACg1B+8
> >UKcbdXfJwL/u5nzZERpS7HI=
> >=8pvC
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf