Re: [OSPF] update "draft-kou-ospf-immediately-replying-hello-00.txt"

Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 20 June 2006 17:06 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FsjgS-0002B6-4j; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:06:36 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FsjgQ-000266-Ow for ospf@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:06:34 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FsjgP-0000VD-GF for ospf@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:06:34 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Jun 2006 10:06:33 -0700
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.06,157,1149490800"; d="scan'208"; a="30052235:sNHT22725364"
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k5KH6WYL004562; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:06:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:06:32 -0400
Received: from [10.82.216.166] ([10.82.216.166]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:06:31 -0400
Message-ID: <44982B17.9060802@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:06:31 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Zengjie Kou <kouzengjie@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] update "draft-kou-ospf-immediately-replying-hello-00.txt"
References: <00a901c68ece$65b73330$96726e0a@china.huawei.com> <4492D4D7.6070805@cisco.com> <4493FC03.9000007@cisco.com> <4494534E.1060804@cisco.com> <002e01c6936d$32361000$96726e0a@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <002e01c6936d$32361000$96726e0a@china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jun 2006 17:06:32.0061 (UTC) FILETIME=[E0DD6AD0:01C6948B]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 287c806b254c6353fcb09ee0e53bbc5e
Cc: ospf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Zengjie,

Zengjie Kou wrote:

>hi,Acee
> For immediately replying, I'd like to know what are other implementations(including yours).
>  
>
The two that I've worked on most recently for sure. I also seem to
remember someone
saying their variant of Zebra had this modification. I'll let others
speak for their own
implementations.

>Would you like to make them included in the dratf? I hope to discuss detailedly.
>What's your opinion?
>  
>
As I previously stated, I'm not all the high on trying to standardize
the immediate
reply behavior.

Thanks,
Acee

>thanks
>Zengjie.
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Acee Lindem" <acee@cisco.com>
>To: "Russ White" <riw@cisco.com>
>Cc: "Zengjie Kou" <kouzengjie@huawei.com>; <ospf@ietf.org>
>Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 3:09 AM
>Subject: Re: [OSPF] update "draft-kou-ospf-immediately-replying-hello-00.txt"
>
>
>  
>
>>Hi Zengjie,
>>Russ White wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Speaking as a WG member, my personal opinion is that the WG should
>>>>accept this document an an informational of BCP track RFC.
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>This sounds fine.... Count my vote in that direction, as well.
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Actually, I meant NOT accept as WG document I guess that what I get for
>>trying
>>to respond to E-mail sitting in the middle seat on a crowded plane. Here
>>is my
>>reasoning why:
>>
>>1. This behavior is not new - there are several implementations that
>>already reply immediately in certain situations.
>>2. There are many ways of doing this and it is unlikely we will
>>agree on the exact details of how it should be done. I, for one,
>>have implemented it differently than documented in this draft.
>>
>>I just don't think there is that much to be gained by documenting
>>this after the fact when there isn't agreement on the sudtleties of
>>operation.
>>
>>Sorry for the confusion.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Acee
>>
>>    
>>
>>>:-)
>>>
>>>Russ
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>- --
>>>riw@cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone
>>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
>>>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>>>
>>>iD8DBQFEk/wDER27sUhU9OQRAvY9AKCrebSk6VRgr6L/SJGB12m4ZErV0ACg1B+8
>>>UKcbdXfJwL/u5nzZERpS7HI=
>>>=8pvC
>>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf