IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Adoption of "Single Hop MANET Interface" as WG Document

John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Wed, 11 May 2011 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD3FE0693 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GOydG85fdWNv for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og101.obsmtp.com (exprod7og101.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.155]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68056E067C for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob101.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTcrw6oqnS5eCMT+sBtVz4jnPBMdoB2S9@postini.com; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:27:14 PDT
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::88f9:77fd:dfc:4d51%11]) with mapi; Wed, 11 May 2011 13:22:58 -0700
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: Richard Ogier <ogier@earthlink.net>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:22:56 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Adoption of "Single Hop MANET Interface" as WG Document
Thread-Index: AcwP/cBH1M3yrTPRSA+pbB/LgDH97QAGqdfw
Message-ID: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A09A87C342@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
References: <24646CE17826CF4A8DF71F9856C7E65659240FE2F3@GVW1338EXA.americas.hpqcorp.net> <4DCAC26F.4030604@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <4DCAC26F.4030604@earthlink.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Adoption of "Single Hop MANET Interface" as WG Document
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:27:16 -0000

Richard,

Don't you think you are being a bit presumptuous?  I think this decision is the prerogative of the working group and I don't necessarily think 'fairness' has anything to do with it.  Further, having multiple drafts in a given subject area is generally considered a bad idea.

Thanks,

John

Sent from my iPhone


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ospf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Richard Ogier
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 10:08 AM
> To: ospf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OSPF] Adoption of "Single Hop MANET Interface" as WG
> Document
> 
> Note that I plan to submit an analogous draft that describes how
> OSPF-MDR (RFC 5614) can be applied to single-hop broadcast networks.
> If
> draft-retana-ospf-manet-single-hop is accepted as a WG document, then
> it
> would also be fair to accept the analogous draft for OSPF-MDR as a WG
> document.
> 
> Regards,
> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email