IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Adoption of "Single Hop MANET Interface" as WG Document

"Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com> Wed, 11 May 2011 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC26E089C for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1DTeGUkjC5Qi for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com (blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com [130.76.32.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3467DE0877 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-av-01.boeing.com (slb-av-01.boeing.com [129.172.13.4]) by blv-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/8.14.4/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id p4BLwXGL009539 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 11 May 2011 14:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-av-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slb-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id p4BLRIwi018637; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NWHT-03.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-03.nw.nos.boeing.com [130.247.71.23]) by slb-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with ESMTP id p4BLRIDi018616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Wed, 11 May 2011 14:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.85]) by XCH-NWHT-03.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.71.23]) with mapi; Wed, 11 May 2011 14:58:33 -0700
From: "Henderson, Thomas R" <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>
To: 'John E Drake' <jdrake@juniper.net>, Richard Ogier <ogier@earthlink.net>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:58:32 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Adoption of "Single Hop MANET Interface" as WG Document
Thread-Index: AcwP/cBH1M3yrTPRSA+pbB/LgDH97QAGqdfwAAM7tnA=
Message-ID: <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CEED717B5@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <24646CE17826CF4A8DF71F9856C7E65659240FE2F3@GVW1338EXA.americas.hpqcorp.net><4DCAC26F.4030604@earthlink.net> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A09A87C342@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A09A87C342@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Adoption of "Single Hop MANET Interface" as WG Document
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:58:42 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ospf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> John E Drake
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 1:23 PM
> To: Richard Ogier; ospf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OSPF] Adoption of "Single Hop MANET Interface" as WG
> Document
> 
> Richard,
> 
> Don't you think you are being a bit presumptuous?  I think this
> decision is the prerogative of the working group and I don't
> necessarily think 'fairness' has anything to do with it.  Further,
> having multiple drafts in a given subject area is generally considered
> a bad idea.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John
> 

John, it has been on the OSPF WG charter to develop multiple OSPFv3 MANET Experimental RFCs.

- Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email