IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Adoption of "Single Hop MANET Interface" as WG Document

Richard Ogier <ogier@earthlink.net> Wed, 11 May 2011 22:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ogier@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E348E08B1 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.041
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.041 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tIkvIIC+YfWT for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.63]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4594E08A5 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=gUEP9q0C0ESNIQJoXpLY8O3IcRNf850AClYG/giQHhrJmg47GoOnrETy9SIhIFZW; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [66.81.104.125] by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <ogier@earthlink.net>) id 1QKI3A-0002WK-F9; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:38:37 -0400
Message-ID: <4DCB105F.9030806@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:40:31 -0700
From: Richard Ogier <ogier@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
References: <24646CE17826CF4A8DF71F9856C7E65659240FE2F3@GVW1338EXA.americas.hpqcorp.net> <4DCAC26F.4030604@earthlink.net> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A09A87C342@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <4DCB0AEA.3060804@earthlink.net> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A09A87C5DD@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A09A87C5DD@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: a073897a9455599e74bf435c0eb9d478504bcfd8a9496c94657578c282a6579bdb1a844c5709ecbe350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 66.81.104.125
Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Adoption of "Single Hop MANET Interface" as WG Document
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:38:45 -0000

  But it is true that people will need to read both drafts before they can come to that same conclusion.  Therefore, my point is to let people know there will soon be another draft describing how another OSPF-MANET extension can be applied to this case.

JD:   Again, that is not what you said.  And it isn’t clear to me that the world needs yet another protocol choice.

The fact is that both RFCs already solve the problem.  Therefore, we are not talking about another protocol choice.

Anyway, Acee's recent post shows that he is being fair.

Richard


v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email