IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Stronger Non-IPSec OSPFv2 Authentication

Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com> Fri, 06 April 2007 19:30 UTC

Return-path: <ospf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZu8e-0004Ky-Cp; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 15:30:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZu8d-0004Kt-Ev for ospf@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 15:30:23 -0400
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([155.53.12.9]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZu8b-0007ws-O4 for ospf@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 15:30:23 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EF3D81969; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17074-01; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [?*???R?IPv6???1] (login005.redback.com [155.53.12.64]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735B1D81966; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <FF22D8DA3CC478438280A45A7CFAD27A0310FE68@ca-bay-exch-01.tropos.com>
References: <FF22D8DA3CC478438280A45A7CFAD27A0310FE68@ca-bay-exch-01.tropos.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Message-Id: <DC301A97-374D-47BA-A1CD-6C896FF6E62A@redback.com>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Stronger Non-IPSec OSPFv2 Authentication
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 15:24:23 -0400
To: Mukesh Gupta <mukesh.gupta@tropos.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 410b68b37343617c6913e76d02180b14
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1208752389=="
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Mukesh,

My opinion is yes although Bill Fenner raised the question whether it  
made sense to do both. Can someone present this draft at IETF-69 in   
Chicago (or provide slides and I will present it)?

Thanks,
Acee
On Mar 27, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Mukesh Gupta wrote:

> Acee,
>
>
>
> Are we planning to pursue these drafts AND the OSPFv2 Security  
> using IPsec draft?
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gupta-ospf-ospfv2-sec-00.txt
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Mukesh
>
>
>
> From: Acee Lindem [mailto:acee@redback.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 6:16 AM
> To: OSPF List
> Subject: [OSPF] Stronger Non-IPSec OSPFv2 Authentication
>
>
>
> These drafts were presented in San Diego and seem to have  
> considerable support.
>
>
>
> draft-bhatia-manral-crypto-req-ospf-01.txt
>
> draft-bhatia-manral-white-ospf-hmac-sha-03.txt
>
>
>
> Hence, we plan to make these WG documents unless there is  
> significant opposition or a compelling reason not to do so.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email