IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OSPF] Re: Stronger Non-IPSec OSPFv2 Authentication

Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com> Wed, 28 March 2007 12:44 UTC

Return-path: <ospf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWXW8-0002ti-0x; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:44:44 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWXW6-0002s2-4R for ospf@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:44:42 -0400
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([155.53.12.9]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HWXW3-0002XL-Rx for ospf@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:44:42 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF997C1B5F for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 05:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23034-07 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 05:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [?????R?IPv6???1] (login005.redback.com [155.53.12.64]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044E97C1B5D for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 05:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
In-Reply-To: <C784E5DF-DAED-402E-9AC4-D8924E64356A@redback.com>
References: <C784E5DF-DAED-402E-9AC4-D8924E64356A@redback.com>
Message-Id: <D5E719B8-D655-4849-867D-C0C675F0F255@redback.com>
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@redback.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:43:54 -0400
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 25620135586de10c627e3628c432b04a
Subject: [OSPF] Re: Stronger Non-IPSec OSPFv2 Authentication
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0193241326=="
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org

After discussions with members of the ISIS WG, there is a third  
option which
would be to accept draft-bhatia-manral-white-ospf-hmac-sha-03.txt but  
not
draft-bhatia-manral-crypto-req-ospf-01.txt. I'd like to throw that  
out as an
option.

Thanks,
Acee


On Mar 27, 2007, at 9:16 AM, Acee Lindem wrote:

> These drafts were presented in San Diego and seem to have  
> considerable support.
>
> draft-bhatia-manral-crypto-req-ospf-01.txt
> draft-bhatia-manral-white-ospf-hmac-sha-03.txt
>
> Hence, we plan to make these WG documents unless there is  
> significant opposition or a compelling reason not to do so.
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email