IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] H-bit Support for OSPFv2 - draft-keyupate-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-01 WG Document Adoption Poll

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 01 October 2015 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA271A87F2 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DYhETvmCfr72 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FC741A87EC for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4967; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1443723122; x=1444932722; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=p2wujDNuO/BZIuglht4u34067ear6PWcD32j9ZmMr7c=; b=b/YlLcvNAikGbBi/qLVxSJoz5UJQBKlf3U5Dsdqf1dwJWj85BpfUQu4Z D1OQaC795nXTSJAPZO5JaC0kTn454c/q25OTvlUK5XEBau4ItrkESdSZN 9nGGs5OgqXFwJtWeYVexFVfYtXZWh4BCAg+avTUf/kA/8uOUYnYN7tWJO c=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CwAgDzdg1W/4cNJK1eglpNVG4GvWsOgXEBCYV5gTc4FAEBAQEBAQF/C4QlAQEEAQEBax0BCAQ7LgsUEwQTDoggDadIpC8BAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBARcEiQOCboUJgyOBFAWSRoMzAYJKgWGIaIFQhDaNCIRWg24BHwFDgkSBPnGIcoEGAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,618,1437436800"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="193488338"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2015 18:12:02 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (xch-rtp-014.cisco.com [64.101.220.154]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t91IBx09029797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 18:12:00 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (64.101.220.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:11:59 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:11:58 -0400
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] H-bit Support for OSPFv2 - draft-keyupate-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-01 WG Document Adoption Poll
Thread-Index: AQHQ/HSpF1KbWxqPV06t0xFiUx/WGg==
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 18:11:58 +0000
Message-ID: <2CB11F42-E0EA-490D-8C65-58FCE1266A12@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.253.79]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3A79F8D4-CBAE-4377-BEA6-9992E2E9A589"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/Wfkb7q3xleD5fWaNTSleKrg-7Dw>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] H-bit Support for OSPFv2 - draft-keyupate-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-01 WG Document Adoption Poll
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 18:12:03 -0000

I support this. I do think we need to move people to OSPFv3 rather than update OSPFv2, but this seems straightforward.

On 9/26/15, 12:04 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com <mailto:acee@cisco.com>> wrote:

This draft was presented in Prague and there was consensus in the room
that it was a valid use case. It provides protocol mechanisms to
absolutely prevent transit traffic for OSPFv2 Routers (RFC 6987 only
discourages transit traffic). The draft also includes assurance of
backward compatibility.

Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
Document.

Thanks,
Acee


_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org <mailto:OSPF@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email