Re: [OSPF] H-bit Support for OSPFv2 - draft-keyupate-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-01 WG Document Adoption Poll

Padma Pillay-Esnault <ppe@cisco.com> Fri, 09 October 2015 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ppe@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98D31B3EF9 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 06:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uw4Sadp74MVs for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 06:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 535021B3EF5 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 06:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=747; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444398688; x=1445608288; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RLuHday7R3eGxV5LG28ge8VZuMFNJivuUOf0HqAarHA=; b=THJVIOMaNyxpcSbmvMhcM1Bz8kkW3tpNV7Rasufn5/uYZ7TcPvGsSlm5 3XPn/6IuY5hZS1Tjj2Nt9YlI1rKSYW510qdKuUhp9CcZk+aiFChBnQKim TjPC+q6JA5E1AMJIJOyb/+z+UgsXtNOFnPAk39/+23mtsno+ZJ5TbWjRI k=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,658,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="196172851"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Oct 2015 13:51:27 +0000
Received: from [10.82.233.37] (rtp-vpn5-292.cisco.com [10.82.233.37]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t99DpP4h025883; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 13:51:26 GMT
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "Keyur Patel (keyupate)" <keyupate@cisco.com>, "Manish Bhardwaj (manbhard)" <manbhard@cisco.com>, "Serpil Bayraktar (serpil)" <serpil@cisco.com>
References: <D22C6483.32EB0%acee@cisco.com> <D23D3ADE.34520%acee@cisco.com>
From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <ppe@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <5617C65E.8050507@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 06:51:26 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D23D3ADE.34520%acee@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/yoeQ5dwU6jbbOEPM27fmakU9t08>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] H-bit Support for OSPFv2 - draft-keyupate-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-01 WG Document Adoption Poll
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 13:51:30 -0000

Acee

Thanks. Will do

Padma
On 10/9/15 6:38 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Authors,
> There is support for making this a WG document. Please resubmit this draft
> as draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-00.txt.
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> On 9/26/15, 3:04 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> This draft was presented in Prague and there was consensus in the room
>> that it was a valid use case. It provides protocol mechanisms to
>> absolutely prevent transit traffic for OSPFv2 Routers (RFC 6987 only
>> discourages transit traffic). The draft also includes assurance of
>> backward compatibility.
>>
>> Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
>> Document.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>>