Re: what is the fundamental difference between OSPF and IS-IS?

Arthur Dimitrelis <arthurd@ARC.CORP.MOT.COM> Fri, 23 August 2002 06:07 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA24685 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 02:07:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.006E7639@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 2:09:09 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 91127 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 02:09:08 -0400
Received: from 136.182.1.10 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 02:09:08 -0400
Received: [from pobox4.mot.com (pobox4.mot.com [10.64.251.243]) by motgate2.mot.com (motgate2 2.1) with ESMTP id XAA20247 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 23:09:15 -0700 (MST)]
Received: [from homer.arc.corp.mot.com (homer.arc.corp.mot.com [10.238.80.38]) by pobox4.mot.com (MOT-pobox4 2.0) with ESMTP id XAA04169 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 23:09:05 -0700 (MST)]
Received: from arc.corp.mot.com (arthurd.arc.corp.mot.com [10.238.80.59]) by homer.arc.corp.mot.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7N68w7C029110 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:08:58 +1000 (EST)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <B036F14C7A7FD511827000805FFEA8AD0C9EA1@eee-fs7.bham.ac.uk> <3D657D4D.852EE417@arc.corp.mot.com> <3D65867E.F0B387F@arc.corp.mot.com> <007601c24a4b$b1d62800$4002a8c0@foundrynet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <3D65D17A.E0CDD630@arc.corp.mot.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:08:58 +1000
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Arthur Dimitrelis <arthurd@ARC.CORP.MOT.COM>
Subject: Re: what is the fundamental difference between OSPF and IS-IS?
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Felix,

it is publicly available, but as far as I can tell, you will need an IEEE
subscription in order to download it, from IEEE Xplore at least.

Those who have the necessary IEEE subscription can go to:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org

Failing this, I'd expect to find a hard copy at a university library.

cheers,
Arthur

Felix Lin wrote:

> Arthur,
>
> I tried searching for this paper on Internet but was unsuccessful. Is it
> available publicly? How do I find it?
>
> Thx
> Felix
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Arthur Dimitrelis" <arthurd@ARC.CORP.MOT.COM>
> To: <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 5:49 PM
> Subject: Re: what is the fundamental difference between OSPF and IS-IS?
>
> > Sorry, I take that last point back. The said paper is available in
> electronic
> > form, but I have no idea if it's free (in a monetary sense) or not.
> >
> > arthur
> >
> > Arthur Dimitrelis wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > there is a paper by Radia Perlman that answers your question, entitled
> "A
> > > Comparison Between Two Routing Protocols: OSPF and IS-IS". It appeared
> in the
> > > September 1991 issue of the IEEE Network Magazine. Contact me off list
> if you
> > > need help finding it (it's freely available in electronic form).
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > > Arthur
> > >
> > > "Liu B." wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for answering my previous questions. I am reading RFC 1142 (OSI
> IS-IS
> > > > Intra-domain Routing Protocol), in order to compare OSPF with IS-IS.
> There
> > > > are so many common things between two of them, such as area routing,
> virtual
> > > > link, designated router ... what is the fundamental difference (or
> > > > improvement?) between OSPF and IS-IS?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks again for all your helps.
> > > >
> > > > Bin Liu
> >