Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental

Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com> Sun, 11 January 2015 03:09 UTC

Return-Path: <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC7F1A1ABB for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:09:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wf9EZa4PIDms for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D668D1A1AB1 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:09:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BNV00498; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:09:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.212.94.48) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:09:24 +0000
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.253]) by SJCEML702-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.46]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:07:58 -0800
From: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental
Thread-Index: AQHQLRmyvootEbC0aUKyIBteteuJP5y6LzJg
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:07:57 +0000
Message-ID: <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D445CDC552@SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com>
References: <D0D6FF2C.B5B6%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D0D6FF2C.B5B6%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.212.245.67]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/mOxcXEWctSI37B4rldbAW1A_Euw>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:09:36 -0000

I was a member of a team on vendor side for dividing a network with only area 0 into a few of areas. The team spent a long time (1+ years) in splitting the network into multiple areas in order to have minimum service interruptions.

OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) provides an easy way to transfer a part of network in an area into a zone smoothly without service interruptions. In a few simple steps, a part of network is transferred into a zone smoothly. The zone also makes the LSDB become smaller. These have been demonstrated live. 

So I support it for WG adoption.

Best Regards,
Huaimo as an author
-----Original Message-----
From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 4:09 PM
To: OSPF WG List
Subject: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental


We have discussed OSPF TTZ at several IETFs and the authors and their colleagues have even developed a working prototype. We believe there is consensus that the protocol mechanisms are viable. However, there is disagreement as to whether or not these mechanisms will provide significant benefit. The answer is definitely topology and deployment dependent. After some discussion, we have decided to poll for adoption as an experimental draft. Please indicate your support or opposition WG adoption as experimental prior to January 24th, 2015.

For your convenience, here is a URL for the draft:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt

Thanks,
Acee and Abhay 

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf