IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental

"Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)" <anil.sn@huawei.com> Mon, 12 January 2015 04:56 UTC

Return-Path: <anil.sn@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE201A8895 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 20:56:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.422
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.422 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IdCW9zZ0XSbl for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 20:56:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80E4D1A8871 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 20:56:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BRC77937; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:55:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.36) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:55:58 +0000
Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.128]) by nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:55:50 +0800
From: "Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)" <anil.sn@huawei.com>
To: "Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)" <anil.sn@huawei.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental
Thread-Index: AQHQLRmyvootEbC0aUKyIBteteuJP5y7NigAgAC2PYCAAAFg8A==
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:55:49 +0000
Message-ID: <327562D94EA7BF428CD805F338C31EF02B6FC3AC@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <D0D6FF2C.B5B6%acee@cisco.com> <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A6503ACDEFC8@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.152.169]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/vFWszBr7HzjMDn-kzjfV4gRnu0w>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 04:56:02 -0000

Support!

Reagrds
Anil S N

-----Original Message-----
From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Wunan (Eric)
Sent: 12 January 2015 07:28
To: Acee Lindem (acee); OSPF WG List
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental

Support!

Regards
Eric

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com] 
发送时间: 2015年1月11日 5:09
收件人: OSPF WG List
主题: [OSPF] OSPF Topology Transparent Zone (TTZ) WG Poll for Adoption as Experimental


We have discussed OSPF TTZ at several IETFs and the authors and their colleagues have even developed a working prototype. We believe there is consensus that the protocol mechanisms are viable. However, there is disagreement as to whether or not these mechanisms will provide significant benefit. The answer is definitely topology and deployment dependent. After some discussion, we have decided to poll for adoption as an experimental draft. Please indicate your support or opposition WG adoption as experimental prior to January 24th, 2015.

For your convenience, here is a URL for the draft:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chen-ospf-ttz-09.txt

Thanks,
Acee and Abhay 


_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email