Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Correct file appended
Richard Ogier <ogier@earthlink.net> Mon, 13 November 2006 16:35 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gjelw-0006up-QR; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:35:00 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gjelv-0006uh-Ec for ospf@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:34:59 -0500
Received: from pop-savannah.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([207.69.195.69]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gjelr-0002u5-6v for ospf@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:34:59 -0500
Received: from dialup-4.243.140.157.dial1.sanfrancisco1.level3.net ([4.243.140.157] helo=earthlink.net) by pop-savannah.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1Gjelo-00006H-00; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:34:53 -0500
Message-ID: <45589EAA.6030305@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 08:34:50 -0800
From: Richard Ogier <ogier@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 (emach0202)
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Correct file appended
References: <45587A54.1090309@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org
> Acee: Show hands on what should be done: > - Quit working on OSPF MANET: none > - Continue to drive to consensus: none > - Refine drafts and publish as experimental: 2/3's of people > in room. To be validated on list. Acee, Correct me if I am wrong, but since the latest version of INRIA's draft was available only last week, and since previous versions did not fully specify the protocol (as pointed out by Phil Spagnolo in his 9/28/06 post to the ospf-manet list), it has not yet been decided that INRIA's draft will be published as experimental. Moreover, since INRIA has not participated in the GTNetS simulation comparison that Boeing has been conducting for the last two years, in which the MDR draft has been compared to Cisco's OR/SP drafts (results can be found at Boeing's OSPF-MANET website http://hipserver.mct.phantomworks.org/ietf/ospf/ ), it is only fair that we should do such a comparison with INRIA's draft before deciding to publish it as experimental. In fact, that has been the plan since the Dallas IETF meeting in March, and Philippe agreed to this in his message of 4/5/06: Philippe Jacquet wrote on 4/5/06: > Yes it would be great to synchronize our efforts on GTNet. > Let's see how to proceed. Now, 7 months later, INRIA has implemented their solution in GTNetS, so the next step would be for Boeing to work with INRIA to make sure the code is debugged and implemented in a manner that allows a fair comparison, just as Boeing has done with the OR/SP and MDR solutions over the last two years. Hopefully, this work can be completed by the next IETF meeting. I think it is reasonable and fair to require such a comparison to be done before INRIA's draft is accepted, especially since they promised to synchronize efforts 7 months ago. Let me know if you agree or disagree. IMO, to give INRIA a free pass and avoid such a comparison would be unfair to those of us who worked hard for the last two years on the GTNetS simulation effort. Richard _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Correct … Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… Richard Ogier
- RE: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… Manav Bhatia
- Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… Richard Ogier
- Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… U. Nilrebmorf
- Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… Richard Ogier
- Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… Richard Ogier
- RE: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… Phil Cowburn
- RE: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
- Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… John Smith
- Re: [OSPF] IETF 67 OSPF WG Meeting minutes - Corr… Vishwas Manral