Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics

"Hao Chen" <chsoft@gmail.com> Mon, 18 August 2008 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566E43A6800; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA60B3A65A5 for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_63=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id osEfVFlOTTtT for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.225]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86E83A6800 for <p2pi@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1597150rvf.49 for <p2pi@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=wvBBDxb03oFC3AFXcbG1bbImgZlm3XE8mE52CxYJTyg=; b=rKhT5if3ZEIz/tqVyfUnpB3qYbDeKlyB/8MOdHilJ4rHjgTxCqpnHk9n/EEca0g1lQ oNBGt3HQlZb0FooeQSHGCu/C3SuzwJ1c3H4hOiX5FWY6eyl5NgLuAx/jKzJehShZRNWQ VmzmWcYSUVMdihtxqqv0vMnaY9/FPHMYrNdyc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=Ud6WKTJV4bXwYPih3QMy1wkeXmziC7VqEWYDHGZjDaF/DS437Wl8/HS66PAfnBouHQ mSjBh0O2AITk8QzlKMpn2lCihvniC2jr48R0Oo1lJE41ayyS/Wv/s3M5yUuWn8JXMXk7 5OoiCk6Ea/OFsyb+yZdj0Cu3/UnBkQ4iVrd8Y=
Received: by 10.141.49.6 with SMTP id b6mr3071643rvk.89.1219052604519; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.33.6 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <df9ced400808180243w73fffaf4r1431966104dee6fc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:43:24 +0800
From: Hao Chen <chsoft@gmail.com>
To: Stas Khirman <stas@khirman.com>
In-Reply-To: <004601c90109$844b9890$6500a8c0@viceroy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <004601c90109$844b9890$6500a8c0@viceroy>
Cc: p2pi@ietf.org, p4pwg@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0421538333=="
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org

How many ASes does the overlay span totally? It seems the hotspot effect is
not very obvious as compared to previous study. What about cluster effect of
overlay by which I mean the ratio of neighbors of the peer in the same AS or
ISP?
2008/8/18 Stas Khirman <stas@khirman.com>

>  To estimate a feasibility of ALTO/P4P for real life torrents , I
> collected <ip,port> information for peers from one of the most popular
> "PirateBay" torrents ( almost 20k peers) and maped their IPs to corresponded
> ASs. Please find attached my working notes with some interesting statistics.
>
>
>
> In short – for such kind of swarm (20k peers), almost half of peers belong
> to ASs with 100 or more peers, almost 2/3 of peers belong to ASs with 50 or
> more peers. Less then 15% of peers belong to ASs with 10 or less
> "neighbors".
>
>
>
> US broadband ISPs (Road Runner, Comcast, AT&T) have about 2-3% of total
> peers each.
>
>
>
> Also, I find it surprising geo distribution of the peers – majority were in
> UK , not in US (probably because content is available in US theaters).
>  Places 3-5 taken by Sweden, Poland and Canada (in total – more peers then
> in US).
>
>
>
> Certainly, observed "heavy" neighboring of peers is a function of swarm
> size. I intend to investigate a few medium/small size swarms to have a
> multi-point picture for any future discussions.
>
>
>
> I would appreciate comments, corrections and additional ideas on data
> collection and analysis.
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2pi mailing list
> p2pi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi
>
>


-- 
Cheers,Hao

Fudan University
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi