[p2pi] Real life torrent statistics

"Stas Khirman" <stas@khirman.com> Mon, 18 August 2008 08:08 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8803A6990; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888E328C0E0 for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hagnwq1KNTjT for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91B33A6843 for <p2pi@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viceroy (c-24-130-57-189.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.130.57.189]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKp8S-1KUzmK0jfC-0003gs; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:08:01 -0400
From: Stas Khirman <stas@khirman.com>
To: p2pi@ietf.org, p4pwg@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:07:50 -0700
Message-ID: <004601c90109$844b9890$6500a8c0@viceroy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0047_01C900CE.D7ECC090"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AckBCYHpAk/nXoimStKiXtQgM06R5w==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19zLxKAMG2wAhzeyg2KXtCC7vmk+hcbIZIAHyn fadMOipqa83T3T5lDM1FOs1CwmSiUeuRYyyeAJlqtJhQlNky+P R9b20lk9dDC3otHoTiJSA==
Subject: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org

To estimate a feasibility of ALTO/P4P for real life torrents , I collected
<ip,port> information for peers from one of the most popular "PirateBay"
torrents ( almost 20k peers) and maped their IPs to corresponded ASs. Please
find attached my working notes with some interesting statistics.

 

In short - for such kind of swarm (20k peers), almost half of peers belong
to ASs with 100 or more peers, almost 2/3 of peers belong to ASs with 50 or
more peers. Less then 15% of peers belong to ASs with 10 or less
"neighbors".

 

US broadband ISPs (Road Runner, Comcast, AT&T) have about 2-3% of total
peers each.

 

Also, I find it surprising geo distribution of the peers - majority were in
UK , not in US (probably because content is available in US theaters).
Places 3-5 taken by Sweden, Poland and Canada (in total - more peers then in
US).

 

Certainly, observed "heavy" neighboring of peers is a function of swarm
size. I intend to investigate a few medium/small size swarms to have a
multi-point picture for any future discussions.

 

I would appreciate comments, corrections and additional ideas on data
collection and analysis. 

_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi