Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics
"Stas Khirman" <stas@khirman.com> Mon, 18 August 2008 18:01 UTC
Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D3E3A6D59; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFDA3A6D59 for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_63=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vbbZ648LUBZ for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011653A6A95 for <p2pi@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viceroy (adsl-69-228-190-230.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [69.228.190.230]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKpCa-1KV9292o9c-0005Iw; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:00:53 -0400
From: Stas Khirman <stas@khirman.com>
To: 'Hao Chen' <chsoft@gmail.com>
References: <004601c90109$844b9890$6500a8c0@viceroy> <df9ced400808180243w73fffaf4r1431966104dee6fc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:00:48 -0700
Message-ID: <00ff01c9015c$5aede950$6500a8c0@viceroy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AckBFtwUid1CUVXvTjaokMj/8r31rQARF1Bw
In-Reply-To: <df9ced400808180243w73fffaf4r1431966104dee6fc@mail.gmail.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+G9JiMR7I9ZX2+gISizz36YxqScx9oFj4NRIi Qhke9K5dAL2/LDiejUEtkUtPjn8fA5AV/g3Njs1c9O5H7qKUgv pkmfhfOoM2l2H30stRkZg==
Cc: p2pi@ietf.org, p4pwg@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0650433778=="
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Sorry that I missed this number in my notes . The dataset includes 19333 unique <ip,port> pairs ( some IPs are repeatable) from 1459 ASs. Or 13.25 peers/AS in average. While aggregated by "ISP name", I got 1368 unique ISP names ( not very accurate estimation by second part of AS name) or 14.1 peers per "ISP" _____ From: Hao Chen [mailto:chsoft@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 2:43 AM To: Stas Khirman Cc: p2pi@ietf.org; p4pwg@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics How many ASes does the overlay span totally? It seems the hotspot effect is not very obvious as compared to previous study. What about cluster effect of overlay by which I mean the ratio of neighbors of the peer in the same AS or ISP? 2008/8/18 Stas Khirman <stas@khirman.com> To estimate a feasibility of ALTO/P4P for real life torrents , I collected <ip,port> information for peers from one of the most popular "PirateBay" torrents ( almost 20k peers) and maped their IPs to corresponded ASs. Please find attached my working notes with some interesting statistics. In short - for such kind of swarm (20k peers), almost half of peers belong to ASs with 100 or more peers, almost 2/3 of peers belong to ASs with 50 or more peers. Less then 15% of peers belong to ASs with 10 or less "neighbors". US broadband ISPs (Road Runner, Comcast, AT&T) have about 2-3% of total peers each. Also, I find it surprising geo distribution of the peers - majority were in UK , not in US (probably because content is available in US theaters). Places 3-5 taken by Sweden, Poland and Canada (in total - more peers then in US). Certainly, observed "heavy" neighboring of peers is a function of swarm size. I intend to investigate a few medium/small size swarms to have a multi-point picture for any future discussions. I would appreciate comments, corrections and additional ideas on data collection and analysis. _______________________________________________ p2pi mailing list p2pi@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi -- Cheers,Hao Fudan University
_______________________________________________ p2pi mailing list p2pi@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi
- [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics Stas Khirman
- Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics Hao Chen
- Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics Stas Khirman
- Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics Victor Semanic
- Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics Song Haibin
- Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics Reinaldo Penno
- Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics Stas Khirman
- Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics Stas Khirman
- Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics Salman Abdul Baset
- Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics The 8472
- Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics Laird Popkin
- Re: [p2pi] Real life torrent statistics Stas Khirman