[P2PSIP] Design decisions
"Henry Sinnreich" <hsinnrei@adobe.com> Mon, 05 March 2007 17:52 UTC
Return-path: <p2psip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOHMW-00086Q-3U; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:52:40 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOHMT-00084l-1N for p2psip@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:52:37 -0500
Received: from chip2og55.obsmtp.com ([64.18.13.47]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOHMP-00007z-I6 for p2psip@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:52:37 -0500
Received: from source ([192.150.11.134]) by chip2ob55.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:52:22 PST
Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l25Hq6D1013536; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:52:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fe1.corp.adobe.com (fe1.corp.adobe.com [10.8.192.70]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l25Hq5If009840; Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:52:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from namail5.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.192.88]) by fe1.corp.adobe.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 09:52:09 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:52:02 -0800
Message-ID: <24CCCC428EFEA2469BF046DB3C7A8D22526EC3@namail5.corp.adobe.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Design decisions
Thread-Index: AcdfMheUcfKBB+bNTLKtgcokX8qUIAAD0cMgAANfX+A=
References: <0JE8009YECWST6@szxga03-in.huawei.com><003101c75ed9$cd7d8ce0$7205a40a@china.huawei.com> <9dc4a1670703050624y7ada1cbfpa9e9d65340801b75@mail.gmail.com>
From: Henry Sinnreich <hsinnrei@adobe.com>
To: Henry Sinnreich <hsinnrei@adobe.com>, EdPimentl <edpimentl@gmail.com>, JiangXingFeng <jiang.x.f@huawei.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2007 17:52:09.0588 (UTC) FILETIME=[FF226340:01C75F4E]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ff03b0075c3fc728d7d60a15b4ee1ad2
Cc: Kundan Singh <kundan@adobe.com>, P2PSIP Mailing List <p2psip@ietf.org>
Subject: [P2PSIP] Design decisions
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: p2psip-bounces@ietf.org
-----Original Message----- From: Henry Sinnreich Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 10:30 AM To: 'EdPimentl'; JiangXingFeng Cc: P2PSIP Mailing List; Kundan Singh; 'Henning Schulzrinne' Subject: RE: [P2PSIP] RE: Ed Pimentel wrote: >Why are we using OpenDHT as an example, when currently OpenDHT method of >putting bits on the wired is not compliant with the drafts being >discussed. This is a good and also important question that will require some work to answer properly. Please see one alternative: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sip/draft-singh-p2p-sip-01.txt though I want to make it clear I am not married to this approach or any other submitted so far. Now that the P2P SIP WG has quite a number of proposals, including the above, I would like to see a paper on the design options and a comparison of the pros and cons of the various concepts. This is probably the most important decision this WG will make and such a decision deserves a formal comparison paper and thorough discussions. We may be attached (or even invested in) to one proposal or another, but do we want to fail by rushing into the wrong decision? What do you all think? Take a hum during the meeting? (Paper on design choices) Thanks, Henry ________________________________________ From: EdPimentl [mailto:edpimentl@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 8:25 AM To: JiangXingFeng Cc: P2PSIP Mailing List Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] RE: Why are we using OpenDHT as an example, when currently OpenDHT method of putting bits on the wired is not compliant with the drafts being discussed. What is the group recommending for those planning on building/coding (line in the sand) to the emerging standards? CHORD, BAMBOO, KADEMLIA or OpenDHT? We do understand that at some point in the future it will be DHT protocol agnostic... and today this is not the case. Looking for your comments. Best, -E On 3/4/07, JiangXingFeng <jiang.x.f@huawei.com> wrote: Hi, Henry: > Your understanding is correct, and I see no reason not to use > openDHT-like networks (maybe even commercial as intended by its > developers) either: > > 1. A multipurpose global "Internet at the application layer", and/or > 2. A bootstrap mechanism for P2PSIP. > > A discussion would be very interesting and welcome indeed. Do you mean that the infrastructure like what OpenDHT provides to provide service is used to organize P2PSIP overlay and help new nodes bootstrap? If my understanding is correct, the OpenDHT should run as stable as possible, because there will a variety of applications or services will be built on it. In this case, the quality of nodes making up of OpenDHT is very different from peers which are discussed in the current P2PSIP mailing list, so the design of Peer protocol should change accordingly. What about your opinions? -- Jiang XingFeng _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list P2PSIP@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip -- Thanks in advance and best regards, Ed Pimentel AgileCO Founder Mail: edpimentl[at]gmail.com IM: edpimentl [AOL | Jabber | Yahoo | MSN ] Voip: edpimentl [SKype | GoogleTalk ] Mobile Content Marketing/Management/Digital Delivery http://mobilecentral.ws Mobile ( Relevant, Ambient, Location ) based Social Network http://TagR.mobi (Alpha) Mobile Payment - P2P Payment http://agilepay.ws Sponsor of P2PSIP open source [viasip_ng] project Creating a standards base P2PSIP dSIP infrastructure https://sourceforge.net/projects/viasip/ Mailing List viasip_ng@freelists.org _______________________________________________ P2PSIP mailing list P2PSIP@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip
- [P2PSIP] RE: JiangXingFeng
- RE: RE: RE: [P2PSIP] What is a Service? Peili Xu
- Re: [P2PSIP] RE: EdPimentl
- RE: [P2PSIP] RE: Henry Sinnreich
- [P2PSIP] Design decisions Henry Sinnreich
- [P2PSIP] Re: Design decisions EdPimentl
- Re: [P2PSIP] Re: Design decisions Victor Pascual Ávila
- RE: [P2PSIP] Re: Design decisions Henry Sinnreich
- Re: [P2PSIP] Re: Design decisions David A. Bryan
- Re: [P2PSIP] Re: Design decisions David A. Bryan
- RE: [P2PSIP] Re: Design decisions Henry Sinnreich
- Re: [P2PSIP] Re: Design decisions Dean Willis