Re: [P2PSIP] Consensus calls

I agree with all 3.

/Miguel

David A. Bryan wrote:
> There were a few hums taken at the meeting at IETF 68 in Prague, and I
> would like to ask the list their thoughts on these, so that we can
> truly say we have consensus on them and move on. Absence of comment
> for a few days will be assumed to be agreement with the (nearly 200)
> folks present.
> 
> 1) With respect to draft-willis-p2psip-concepts-03, we took a hum and
> agreed to adopt it as a WG item and as a start toward the overview
> document mentioned in our charter. We further decided it will not be
> immediately submitted to the IESG, but rather evolve to document the
> decisions we make. That is, it will continue to reflect the consensus
> and outline as that evolves.
> 
> 2) We took a hum and agreed to design the peer protocol in such a way
> that multiple DHTs could be used by the protocol, but only one at a
> time (not simultaneous use of more than one within a particular
> overlay). We further agreed we would have one or a very small number
> of must-implement DHTs, to be determined later, for compatibility. Hum
> was majority agreed, few dissent.
> 
> 3) Took a hum that we should have some mechanism that allows an
> unmodified SIP UA to connect to a DHT using some sort of adaptor. We
> did not specify the protocols for it, how it would look etc -- just
> that we want to include this functionality. Positive response to the
> hum.
> 
> Again, if any of this is something you disagree with, please discuss.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David
> 

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia           tel:+358-50-4804586
Nokia Research Center      Helsinki, Finland

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
P2PSIP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip