Re: [P2PSIP] Choice of STUN peer or TURN peer

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Sun, 03 February 2008 00:57 UTC

Return-Path: <p2psip-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-p2psip-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2psip-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197423A6B1A; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:57:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H9wXJ-y8Jbzh; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:57:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564FA3A6AD5; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:57:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: p2psip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A936A3A6AD5 for <p2psip@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:57:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6cF15T-HTWEf for <p2psip@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F403B3A6A2E for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:57:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2008 16:59:03 -0800
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m130x35N027236; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:59:03 -0800
Received: from [192.168.4.177] (sjc-fluffy-vpn1.cisco.com [10.25.236.82]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with SMTP id m130wsuu018277; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 00:58:54 GMT
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <2e0701c86576$16be5da0$c4f0200a@cisco.com>
Impp: xmpp:cullenfluffyjennings@jabber.org
References: <174701c85f78$24a386b0$44a36b80@cisco.com><001501c86156$04a31ee0$2d09a40a@china.huawei.com><20d2bdfb0801280801s5058a661td76c82985b54918@mail.gmail.com><0B983815-ED15-419D-9F59-47EFC094995E@cisco.com> <1ECE0EB50388174790F9694F77522CCF14996504@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com> <2e0701c86576$16be5da0$c4f0200a@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <32A9EC17-AFFC-48FF-8DF0-05E4522BEAB0@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915)
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:58:32 -0800
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915)
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=fluffy@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: 'P2PSIP Mailing List' <p2psip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Choice of STUN peer or TURN peer
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: p2psip-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2psip-bounces@ietf.org

On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:32 AM, Dan Wing wrote:

> Reports indicate that roughly 25% of NATs would block such incoming  
> packets.


Which reports are you thinking of here ?

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
P2PSIP@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip