IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [P2PSIP] Choice of STUN peer or TURN peer

Song Yongchao <melodysong@huawei.com> Sat, 02 February 2008 01:26 UTC

Return-Path: <p2psip-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-p2psip-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2psip-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E333A68DA; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:26:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.269, BAYES_00=-2.599, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455]
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gxXDVJqlrntD; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:26:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24633A6881; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:26:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: p2psip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDA93A6881 for <p2psip@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:26:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2nr2wmrwJook for <p2psip@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:26:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [61.144.161.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7423A6864 for <p2psip@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:26:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JVL00BGG82LR4@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for p2psip@ietf.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:27:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.18]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JVL00KJC82L9V@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for p2psip@ietf.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:27:57 +0800 (CST)
Received: from s64081 ([10.164.9.47]) by szxml03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JVL005SJ82KOS@szxml03-in.huawei.com> for p2psip@ietf.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:27:57 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:28:16 +0800
From: Song Yongchao <melodysong@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <069d01c864f3$59cdf700$c4f0200a@cisco.com>
To: 'Dan Wing' <dwing@cisco.com>, 'Henry Sinnreich' <hsinnrei@adobe.com>
Message-id: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAIILieByQXtOrs7W/bI503TCgAAAEAAAADNo24hM2QtMlz5WDTz4WUMBAAAAAA==@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-index: AchkjSjvQqR3LNQzQrWRrcJxx0588gAEzSEAAAQh9iAAAd7vAAABiXTgAA0J+vAAEgNwIA==
Cc: 'P2PSIP Mailing List' <p2psip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Choice of STUN peer or TURN peer
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: p2psip-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2psip-bounces@ietf.org

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henry Sinnreich [mailto:hsinnrei@adobe.com]
> > Subject: RE: [P2PSIP] Choice of STUN peer or TURN peer
> >
> > > how a peer that is willing to be a TURN server to detect
> > whether it is
> >
> > > behind a P2P friendly NAT.
> > > Could you please provide some information
> >
> > Two excellent papers deal with NAT discovery:
> >
> > < draft-ietf-behave-nat-behavior-discovery-02>
> > <draft-wing-behave-nat-control-stun-usage-05>
> 
> The second paper, draft-wing-behave-nat-control-stun-usage,
> resulted in a BoF at the last IETF in Vancouver.  The consensus
> at that BoF was that IETF would not be successful building
> such a protocol.  Minutes of the BoF are at
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/07dec/safe.html and audio is available at
> http://videolab.uoregon.edu/events/ietf/.  A mailing list, SAFE, was
created
> to discuss it.  Archives are at
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/safe/current/index.html
> 
Thanks for your information. Dan.

Song Yongchao

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
P2PSIP@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email