Re: [Pana] work items

Hi Alper

We had a draft  called "simplified Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access"
which missed the deadline of the submission.
IMO, it is a good topic to discuss in the meeting.

I  wonder if  it is proper to send out through the mailing list.

The abstract is:
"   This document describes simplified Protocol for Carrying
   Authentication for Network Access (sPANA).  Since in the broadband
   (e.g.  DSL forum, WiMAX forum) architecture, a Network Access Server
   (NAS) is one IP hop away from the user, it is possible to relax the
   need in PANA to obtain an IP address prior to authentication.  The
   PANA client (PaC) could use a unspecified IP address (i.e. 0.0.0.0)
   for authentication.  This document also defines PANA Attribute-Value
   Pairs (AVPs) and procedures that allow for a Challenge-Handshake
   Authentication Protocol(CHAP) exchange to occur in PANA.  PANA CHAP
   support facilitate smooth migration from Point-to-Point Protocol
   (PPP) sessions to IP sessions in a DSL Broadband network environment.
   The sPANA protocol is fully compatible with the basic PANA protocol."

BR
Frank

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alper Yegin" <alper.yegin@yegin.org>
To: <pana@ietf.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 4:41 PM
Subject: [Pana] work items

> 
> One of the things we'd be discussing in the PANA meeting is work scope and
> re-chartering. 
> 
> Now that we delivered the base specification to the RFC editor, we are
> advised by the ADs to revise the charter. Also, we have several work items
> on our plate and we need to go back and see where each one is standing and
> discuss what to do with them.
> 
> We are going to have a discussion on that in Philadelphia and seek WG's
> input. Please be prepared.
> 
> These are the current WG documents (except for the ones in RFC editor's
> queue):
> 
> Active:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-preauth-02
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-statemachine-06
> 
> IESG Processing:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-ipsec-07
> 
> Expired:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ieft-pana-aaa-interworking-00
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-cxtp-01
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-mobopts-01
> 
> The following two are expired, but in fact they should not even show up in
> WG list as we had decided to kill them:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-snmp-06
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-usage-scenarios-06
> 
> 
> For each of these documents, we need to discuss the current status and
> future plan. Also, if there are new documents to be considered as a WG item,
> that should also be brought up.
> 
> Early feedback on the mailing list is welcome.
> 
> - Chairs
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pana mailing list
> Pana@ietf.org
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
> 
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana