Re: [Pana] work items
"Frank Xia" <xiayangsong@huawei.com> Tue, 26 February 2008 02:21 UTC
Return-Path: <pana-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-pana-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pana-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82F528C58C; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:21:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.272
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.272 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.709, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06q02meLadGb; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF06E28C660; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:20:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD8F28C47F for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:20:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vh+-s9W1SFiI for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:20:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nlpi001.prodigy.net (nlpi001.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.36.30]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB473A6E87 for <pana@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:16:58 -0800 (PST)
X-ORBL: [70.245.133.60]
Received: from ny3104051930 (ppp-70-245-133-60.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [70.245.133.60]) by nlpi001.prodigy.net (8.13.8 out.dk.spool/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1Q2Gm28023396; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:16:49 -0600
Message-ID: <001b01c8781e$27a4c180$0401a8c0@china.huawei.com>
From: Frank Xia <xiayangsong@huawei.com>
To: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@yegin.org>, pana@ietf.org
References: <0MKp8S-1JTmFU1AA2-0003uR@mrelay.perfora.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:20:28 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Cc: 'John Kaippallimalil' <jkaippal@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Pana] work items
X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access <pana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: pana-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pana-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Alper According to your suggestion, I uploaded the draft in this place: http://www-etud.iro.umontreal.ca/~sarikaya/pana/draft-xia-pana-simplified-00.txt Comments are welcome! BR Frank ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alper Yegin" <alper.yegin@yegin.org> To: "'Frank Xia'" <xiayangsong@huawei.com>; <pana@ietf.org> Cc: "'John Kaippallimalil'" <jkaippal@huawei.com> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 4:56 PM Subject: RE: [Pana] work items > Frank, > > > You can post it somewhere on the web and send a link on the mailing list. > > Alper > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Frank Xia [mailto:xiayangsong@huawei.com] > > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:25 PM > > To: Alper Yegin; pana@ietf.org > > Cc: John Kaippallimalil > > Subject: Re: [Pana] work items > > > > Hi Alper > > > > We had a draft called "simplified Protocol for Carrying Authentication > > for Network Access" > > which missed the deadline of the submission. > > IMO, it is a good topic to discuss in the meeting. > > > > I wonder if it is proper to send out through the mailing list. > > > > The abstract is: > > " This document describes simplified Protocol for Carrying > > Authentication for Network Access (sPANA). Since in the broadband > > (e.g. DSL forum, WiMAX forum) architecture, a Network Access Server > > (NAS) is one IP hop away from the user, it is possible to relax the > > need in PANA to obtain an IP address prior to authentication. The > > PANA client (PaC) could use a unspecified IP address (i.e. 0.0.0.0) > > for authentication. This document also defines PANA Attribute-Value > > Pairs (AVPs) and procedures that allow for a Challenge-Handshake > > Authentication Protocol(CHAP) exchange to occur in PANA. PANA CHAP > > support facilitate smooth migration from Point-to-Point Protocol > > (PPP) sessions to IP sessions in a DSL Broadband network environment. > > The sPANA protocol is fully compatible with the basic PANA protocol." > > > > BR > > Frank > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Alper Yegin" <alper.yegin@yegin.org> > > To: <pana@ietf.org> > > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 4:41 PM > > Subject: [Pana] work items > > > > > > > > > > One of the things we'd be discussing in the PANA meeting is work scope > > and > > > re-chartering. > > > > > > Now that we delivered the base specification to the RFC editor, we are > > > advised by the ADs to revise the charter. Also, we have several work > > items > > > on our plate and we need to go back and see where each one is standing > > and > > > discuss what to do with them. > > > > > > We are going to have a discussion on that in Philadelphia and seek WG's > > > input. Please be prepared. > > > > > > These are the current WG documents (except for the ones in RFC editor's > > > queue): > > > > > > Active: > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-preauth-02 > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-statemachine-06 > > > > > > IESG Processing: > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-ipsec-07 > > > > > > Expired: > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ieft-pana-aaa-interworking-00 > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-cxtp-01 > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-mobopts-01 > > > > > > The following two are expired, but in fact they should not even show up > > in > > > WG list as we had decided to kill them: > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-snmp-06 > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-usage-scenarios-06 > > > > > > > > > For each of these documents, we need to discuss the current status and > > > future plan. Also, if there are new documents to be considered as a WG > > item, > > > that should also be brought up. > > > > > > Early feedback on the mailing list is welcome. > > > > > > - Chairs > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Pana mailing list > > > Pana@ietf.org > > > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana > > > > > _______________________________________________ Pana mailing list Pana@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
- [Pana] work items Alper Yegin
- Re: [Pana] work items Frank Xia
- Re: [Pana] work items Alper Yegin
- Re: [Pana] work items Frank Xia
- Re: [Pana] work items Julien Bournelle