Re: [Pana] work items

"Frank Xia" <xiayangsong@huawei.com> Tue, 26 February 2008 02:21 UTC

Return-Path: <pana-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-pana-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pana-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82F528C58C; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:21:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.272
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.272 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.709, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06q02meLadGb; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF06E28C660; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:20:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD8F28C47F for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:20:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vh+-s9W1SFiI for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:20:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nlpi001.prodigy.net (nlpi001.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.36.30]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB473A6E87 for <pana@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:16:58 -0800 (PST)
X-ORBL: [70.245.133.60]
Received: from ny3104051930 (ppp-70-245-133-60.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [70.245.133.60]) by nlpi001.prodigy.net (8.13.8 out.dk.spool/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1Q2Gm28023396; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:16:49 -0600
Message-ID: <001b01c8781e$27a4c180$0401a8c0@china.huawei.com>
From: Frank Xia <xiayangsong@huawei.com>
To: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@yegin.org>, pana@ietf.org
References: <0MKp8S-1JTmFU1AA2-0003uR@mrelay.perfora.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:20:28 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Cc: 'John Kaippallimalil' <jkaippal@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [Pana] work items
X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access <pana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: pana-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pana-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Alper

According to your suggestion, I uploaded the draft in this place:
http://www-etud.iro.umontreal.ca/~sarikaya/pana/draft-xia-pana-simplified-00.txt

Comments are welcome!

BR
Frank

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alper Yegin" <alper.yegin@yegin.org>
To: "'Frank Xia'" <xiayangsong@huawei.com>; <pana@ietf.org>
Cc: "'John Kaippallimalil'" <jkaippal@huawei.com>
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 4:56 PM
Subject: RE: [Pana] work items


> Frank,
> 
> 
> You can post it somewhere on the web and send a link on the mailing list.
> 
> Alper 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Frank Xia [mailto:xiayangsong@huawei.com]
> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:25 PM
> > To: Alper Yegin; pana@ietf.org
> > Cc: John Kaippallimalil
> > Subject: Re: [Pana] work items
> > 
> > Hi Alper
> > 
> > We had a draft  called "simplified Protocol for Carrying Authentication
> > for Network Access"
> > which missed the deadline of the submission.
> > IMO, it is a good topic to discuss in the meeting.
> > 
> > I  wonder if  it is proper to send out through the mailing list.
> > 
> > The abstract is:
> > "   This document describes simplified Protocol for Carrying
> >    Authentication for Network Access (sPANA).  Since in the broadband
> >    (e.g.  DSL forum, WiMAX forum) architecture, a Network Access Server
> >    (NAS) is one IP hop away from the user, it is possible to relax the
> >    need in PANA to obtain an IP address prior to authentication.  The
> >    PANA client (PaC) could use a unspecified IP address (i.e. 0.0.0.0)
> >    for authentication.  This document also defines PANA Attribute-Value
> >    Pairs (AVPs) and procedures that allow for a Challenge-Handshake
> >    Authentication Protocol(CHAP) exchange to occur in PANA.  PANA CHAP
> >    support facilitate smooth migration from Point-to-Point Protocol
> >    (PPP) sessions to IP sessions in a DSL Broadband network environment.
> >    The sPANA protocol is fully compatible with the basic PANA protocol."
> > 
> > BR
> > Frank
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Alper Yegin" <alper.yegin@yegin.org>
> > To: <pana@ietf.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 4:41 PM
> > Subject: [Pana] work items
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > > One of the things we'd be discussing in the PANA meeting is work scope
> > and
> > > re-chartering.
> > >
> > > Now that we delivered the base specification to the RFC editor, we are
> > > advised by the ADs to revise the charter. Also, we have several work
> > items
> > > on our plate and we need to go back and see where each one is standing
> > and
> > > discuss what to do with them.
> > >
> > > We are going to have a discussion on that in Philadelphia and seek WG's
> > > input. Please be prepared.
> > >
> > > These are the current WG documents (except for the ones in RFC editor's
> > > queue):
> > >
> > > Active:
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-preauth-02
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-statemachine-06
> > >
> > > IESG Processing:
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-ipsec-07
> > >
> > > Expired:
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ieft-pana-aaa-interworking-00
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-cxtp-01
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-mobopts-01
> > >
> > > The following two are expired, but in fact they should not even show up
> > in
> > > WG list as we had decided to kill them:
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-snmp-06
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-usage-scenarios-06
> > >
> > >
> > > For each of these documents, we need to discuss the current status and
> > > future plan. Also, if there are new documents to be considered as a WG
> > item,
> > > that should also be brought up.
> > >
> > > Early feedback on the mailing list is welcome.
> > >
> > > - Chairs
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pana mailing list
> > > Pana@ietf.org
> > > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
> > >
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana