Re: [Pana] work items

"Julien Bournelle" <julien.bournelle@gmail.com> Tue, 26 February 2008 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <pana-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-pana-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pana-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6CA28C396; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:43:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.518
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.081, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZSwBK0CtX2rZ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459903A6C13; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:43:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107C428C4B7 for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:43:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78evy5D-Eitb for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:43:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.250]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCA328C433 for <pana@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:41:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d11so485654and.122 for <pana@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:40:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=wGlhEeHIlYJBWvMs0IF5AZSXR1khzVRB0P5FJiQYmmE=; b=m3VA1IoonDvZECp23bGJ2Kckg8UePuDYDOHpe0jtvC131pADuL2sv29DKjeL2LieO1cKePW8c228gnuaRNHHMhofblKG0O3tuYDvH6ftserNLelS/2q/TVLZmOsvSf1rEoLitx9oedW4yOXpaaKW0oFTi4GtOpWhnp/B3qk6Gjs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VGg6H3//JA6JyZdGVAXXpIxpMwydL9Qon5SVjTcnq/kV9bqZo7Nn4XgweHqctlR3j2ZIe/eLqtp+yRwxb21VtasV0NLdDTpziGHwhOOQ1RudDniDVV0TC23g822Yb6tcImhKJftXoGqb95PZMfkVw0WVtysbWE7xPh2ep0YL01g=
Received: by 10.100.41.16 with SMTP id o16mr4065557ano.1.1204036856859; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:40:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.249.18 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:40:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5e2406980802260640x3b8ec35eg5d34a3fbc9e1983a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:40:56 +0100
From: Julien Bournelle <julien.bournelle@gmail.com>
To: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@yegin.org>
In-Reply-To: <0MKpCa-1JTPX20oR4-0007Aa@mrelay.perfora.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <0MKpCa-1JTPX20oR4-0007Aa@mrelay.perfora.net>
Cc: pana@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pana] work items
X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access <pana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: pana-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pana-bounces@ietf.org

Hi alper, all,

 comments inline

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@yegin.org> wrote:
>
>  One of the things we'd be discussing in the PANA meeting is work scope and
>  re-chartering.
>
>  Now that we delivered the base specification to the RFC editor, we are
>  advised by the ADs to revise the charter. Also, we have several work items
>  on our plate and we need to go back and see where each one is standing and
>  discuss what to do with them.
>
>  We are going to have a discussion on that in Philadelphia and seek WG's
>  input. Please be prepared.

 I won't be able to attend next PANA meeting but below his my input.

>
>  These are the current WG documents (except for the ones in RFC editor's
>  queue):
>
>  Active:
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-preauth-02
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-statemachine-06
>
>  IESG Processing:
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-ipsec-07
>
>  Expired:
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ieft-pana-aaa-interworking-00

 I think this document is still needed. I can help if needed.

>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-cxtp-01
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-mobopts-01

 If there is still interest in the WG on this, I can provide an update
of pana-cxtp and
help on pana-mobopts. Interest shoud be gauge during the meeting but I
am in favor
of having these 2 documents published.

 Regards,

 Julien Bournelle / Orange Labs




>
>  The following two are expired, but in fact they should not even show up in
>  WG list as we had decided to kill them:
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-snmp-06
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-usage-scenarios-06
>
>
>  For each of these documents, we need to discuss the current status and
>  future plan. Also, if there are new documents to be considered as a WG item,
>  that should also be brought up.
>
>  Early feedback on the mailing list is welcome.
>
>  - Chairs
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Pana mailing list
>  Pana@ietf.org
>  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana
>
_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana