[Pana] work items

"Alper Yegin" <alper.yegin@yegin.org> Sun, 24 February 2008 22:41 UTC

Return-Path: <pana-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-pana-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pana-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626A928C179; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:41:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.374
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.374 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vYEmQfJi2frT; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:41:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B9028C182; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:41:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pana@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0B73A692B for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:41:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JXu-D5rhwNC1 for <pana@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:41:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78DA3A68E4 for <pana@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:41:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from IBM52A5038A94F (dsl88-247-34287.ttnet.net.tr [88.247.133.239]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKpCa-1JTPX20oR4-0007Aa; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:41:18 -0500
From: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@yegin.org>
To: pana@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:41:12 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Thread-Index: Ach3NlscgSJuSLNbSAijbaa5j0v8ug==
Message-Id: <0MKpCa-1JTPX20oR4-0007Aa@mrelay.perfora.net>
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+RcXEGe7EBfEXRKdT7Vx4RCddFwMHCK0mc0/+ ziZTSYw1HNak4oZhvAxesl6sqcbk1euvHpIUyqhCMrzGXFujPz BsVa3HihAfhnq4U3eGuXw==
Subject: [Pana] work items
X-BeenThere: pana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Protocol for carrying Authentication for Network Access <pana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana>, <mailto:pana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: pana-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pana-bounces@ietf.org

One of the things we'd be discussing in the PANA meeting is work scope and
re-chartering. 

Now that we delivered the base specification to the RFC editor, we are
advised by the ADs to revise the charter. Also, we have several work items
on our plate and we need to go back and see where each one is standing and
discuss what to do with them.

We are going to have a discussion on that in Philadelphia and seek WG's
input. Please be prepared.

These are the current WG documents (except for the ones in RFC editor's
queue):

Active:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-preauth-02
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-statemachine-06

IESG Processing:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-ipsec-07

Expired:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ieft-pana-aaa-interworking-00
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-cxtp-01
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-mobopts-01

The following two are expired, but in fact they should not even show up in
WG list as we had decided to kill them:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-snmp-06
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-usage-scenarios-06


For each of these documents, we need to discuss the current status and
future plan. Also, if there are new documents to be considered as a WG item,
that should also be brought up.

Early feedback on the mailing list is welcome.

- Chairs


_______________________________________________
Pana mailing list
Pana@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pana