IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st

"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Wed, 07 March 2012 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7B521F87AE for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:14:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.313
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.313 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.286, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HH3GsHpVMN7b for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:14:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEDD21F87A9 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:14:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=abegen@cisco.com; l=1934; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1331140482; x=1332350082; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=/4ngmFmH1trq5E2ubz29ClO2a0ZLXx3zDaK8u/VMfJc=; b=B+gEejvjoHNLsIR/wOrXuwbnTK1/GVLFMCUPdVwJjsiAqrgtWxH7Kbqj fGIf9NkaUWbxKfrjJFHd81hktU7K50PPZ5pfUKH66X4AH8O57o/oF/aa9 +gQ5Y2NCuh7dhyT63rLqgw8VMo/sePnRs7aWhOdU9BuKd4fFEDpOtst5T w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAAaXV0+rRDoI/2dsb2JhbABEtRyBB4IDBwEBAQQBAQEPAVsXBAIBCA4DBAEBCx0HIQYLFAkIAQEEARIIGoUmB4I4AQuaMwGfGASJOYZTYwSgYoR2gmM
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,547,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="34995949"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2012 17:14:42 +0000
Received: from xht-rcd-x02-p.cisco.com (xht-rcd-x02-p.cisco.com [173.37.178.213]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q27HEgQI023446; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:14:42 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com ([169.254.3.137]) by xht-rcd-x02-p.cisco.com ([173.37.178.213]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 09:14:41 -0800
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st
Thread-Index: AczrRVxjReHrfWv2TROUTdcmKeO0cAOt+NyQAKIVnyA=
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:14:41 +0000
Message-ID: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940D4A0E@xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com>
References: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE99403FAF9@xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com> <4f535b8d.0b5f0e0a.0445.ffffd49a@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <4f535b8d.0b5f0e0a.0445.ffffd49a@mx.google.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.37.178.200]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.4211-6.800.1017-18758.005
x-tm-as-result: No--44.597800-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:14:43 -0000

Thanks Roni, are there any other reviews? I will extend the review period till the 21st. Please provide your comments to the list.

-acbegen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 7:09 AM
> To: Ali C. Begen (abegen); payload@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st
> 
> Hi,
> Sorry for the late review.
> I have some comments.
> 
> 1. In section 4.2 the PictureID definition talk about the msb being a flag.
> Why not show it in figure 2.
> 
> 2. The first paragraph in section 4.3 talk about 10 octets version of the
> uncompressed data chunk, I could not find where the 10 octet version is
> specified. The example in 4.5.1 has the 3 octets version.
> 
> 
> 3. In the example in 4.5.2 is this a discardable packet in which case N
> should be 1.
> 
> 4. In section 6.2.1 the reference to SDP should be RFC 4566. Also in payload
> specification we typically use the media subtype and not MIME subtype.
> 
> Roni Even
> As individual
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: payload-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:payload-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Ali C. Begen (abegen)
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 8:35 PM
> > To: payload@ietf.org
> > Subject: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st
> >
> > WG,
> >
> > This is to start the WGLC for the VP8 draft.
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-payload-vp8/
> >
> > Please send your comments and approvals to the payload list by March
> > 1st.
> >
> > Authors, you need to separate the references as informative vs.
> > normative but please wait till the WGLC ends for a revision.
> >
> > -acbegen
> > _______________________________________________
> > payload mailing list
> > payload@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email