Re: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st

Roni even <Even.roni@huawei.com> Thu, 08 March 2012 00:00 UTC

Return-Path: <Even.roni@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: payload@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5740011E80AB for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 16:00:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BL0UwlkfqH8r for <payload@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 16:00:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D77011E8099 for <payload@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 16:00:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0M0J00382HC11F@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for payload@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:00:01 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0M0J00EI1HC1NQ@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for payload@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:00:01 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml214-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AHQ94882; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:00:01 +0800
Received: from SZXEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.59) by szxeml214-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 07:59:20 +0800
Received: from SZXEML536-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.220]) by szxeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:00:16 +0800
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 23:59:55 +0000
From: Roni even <Even.roni@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940D4A0E@xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com>
X-Originating-IP: [172.24.1.46]
To: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "payload@ietf.org" <payload@ietf.org>
Message-id: <EADCEEE0AE4A7F46BD61061696794D9807721C34@szxeml536-mbx.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Thread-topic: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st
Thread-index: AczrRVxjReHrfWv2TROUTdcmKeO0cAOt+NyQAKIVnyAADizuzQ==
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE99403FAF9@xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com> <4f535b8d.0b5f0e0a.0445.ffffd49a@mx.google.com> <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940D4A0E@xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st
X-BeenThere: payload@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Payloads working group discussion list <payload.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/payload>
List-Post: <mailto:payload@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload>, <mailto:payload-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 00:00:09 -0000

Ali,
There was a comment from Stephan which I think need discussion since I think it make sense
Roni

________________________________________
From: payload-bounces@ietf.org [payload-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Ali C. Begen (abegen) [abegen@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 19:14
To: Roni Even; payload@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st

Thanks Roni, are there any other reviews? I will extend the review period till the 21st. Please provide your comments to the list.

-acbegen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 7:09 AM
> To: Ali C. Begen (abegen); payload@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st
>
> Hi,
> Sorry for the late review.
> I have some comments.
>
> 1. In section 4.2 the PictureID definition talk about the msb being a flag.
> Why not show it in figure 2.
>
> 2. The first paragraph in section 4.3 talk about 10 octets version of the
> uncompressed data chunk, I could not find where the 10 octet version is
> specified. The example in 4.5.1 has the 3 octets version.
>
>
> 3. In the example in 4.5.2 is this a discardable packet in which case N
> should be 1.
>
> 4. In section 6.2.1 the reference to SDP should be RFC 4566. Also in payload
> specification we typically use the media subtype and not MIME subtype.
>
> Roni Even
> As individual
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: payload-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:payload-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Ali C. Begen (abegen)
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 8:35 PM
> > To: payload@ietf.org
> > Subject: [payload] WGLC for draft-ietf-payload-vp8-03 ending March 1st
> >
> > WG,
> >
> > This is to start the WGLC for the VP8 draft.
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-payload-vp8/
> >
> > Please send your comments and approvals to the payload list by March
> > 1st.
> >
> > Authors, you need to separate the references as informative vs.
> > normative but please wait till the WGLC ends for a revision.
> >
> > -acbegen
> > _______________________________________________
> > payload mailing list
> > payload@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload

_______________________________________________
payload mailing list
payload@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/payload